» Articles » PMID: 33623134

Structural Changes in Brains of Patients with Disorders of Consciousness Treated with Deep Brain Stimulation

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Feb 24
PMID 33623134
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Disorders of consciousness (DOC) are one of the major consequences after anoxic or traumatic brain injury. So far, several studies have described the regaining of consciousness in DOC patients using deep brain stimulation (DBS). However, these studies often lack detailed data on the structural and functional cerebral changes after such treatment. The aim of this study was to conduct a volumetric analysis of specific cortical and subcortical structures to determine the impact of DBS after functional recovery of DOC patients. Five DOC patients underwent unilateral DBS electrode implantation into the centromedian parafascicular complex of the thalamic intralaminar nuclei. Consciousness recovery was confirmed using the Rappaport Disability Rating and the Coma/Near Coma scale. Brain MRI volumetric measurements were done prior to the procedure, then approximately a year after, and finally 7 years after the implementation of the electrode. The volumetric analysis included changes in regional cortical volumes and thickness, as well as in subcortical structures. Limbic cortices (parahippocampal and cingulate gyrus) and paralimbic cortices (insula) regions showed a significant volume increase and presented a trend of regional cortical thickness increase 1 and 7 years after DBS. The volumes of related subcortical structures, namely the caudate, the hippocampus as well as the amygdala, were significantly increased 1 and 7 years after DBS, while the putamen and nucleus accumbens presented with volume increase. Volume increase after DBS could be a result of direct DBS effects, or a result of functional recovery. Our findings are in accordance with the results of very few human studies connecting DBS and brain volume increase. Which mechanisms are behind the observed brain changes and whether structural changes are caused by consciousness recovery or DBS in patients with DOC is still a matter of debate.

Citing Articles

Revolutionizing treatment for disorders of consciousness: a multidisciplinary review of advancements in deep brain stimulation.

Yang Y, Cao T, He S, Wang L, He Q, Fan L Mil Med Res. 2024; 11(1):81.

PMID: 39690407 PMC: 11654023. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-024-00585-w.


A human brain network linked to restoration of consciousness after deep brain stimulation.

Warren A, Raguz M, Friedrich H, Schaper F, Tasserie J, Snider S medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39484242 PMC: 11527079. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.17.24314458.


Acute Traumatic Coma Awakening Induced by Median Nerve Electrical Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yang J, Li X, Yang X, Zhu T, Ou S Neurocrit Care. 2024; .

PMID: 39448428 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-024-02141-9.


Is non-invasive neuromodulation a viable technique to improve neuroplasticity in individuals with acquired brain injury? A review.

Eliason M, Kalbande P, Saleem G Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1341707.

PMID: 39296918 PMC: 11408216. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1341707.


[Current progress on characteristics of intracranial electrophysiology related to prolonged disorders of consciousness].

Huang Y, Wu J, Xu M, He J, Ming D Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2024; 41(4):826-832.

PMID: 39218610 PMC: 11366456. DOI: 10.7507/1001-5515.202403023.


References
1.
Overgaard M . The Status and Future of Consciousness Research. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1719. PMC: 5641373. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01719. View

2.
Okubo Y, Iino M . Visualization of glutamate as a volume transmitter. J Physiol. 2010; 589(Pt 3):481-8. PMC: 3055537. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.199539. View

3.
Haber S, Calzavara R . The cortico-basal ganglia integrative network: the role of the thalamus. Brain Res Bull. 2008; 78(2-3):69-74. PMC: 4459637. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.09.013. View

4.
Block N . Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behav Brain Sci. 2008; 30(5-6):481-99. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X07002786. View

5.
Overgaard M, Mogensen J . Visual perception from the perspective of a representational, non-reductionistic, level-dependent account of perception and conscious awareness. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014; 369(1641):20130209. PMC: 3965164. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0209. View