» Articles » PMID: 33622373

Trauma Quality Indicators: Internationally Approved Core Factors for Trauma Management Quality Evaluation

Abstract

Introduction: Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them.

Material And Methods: A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference RESULTS: An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post-traumatic management, and society integrational effects.

Conclusion: Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes.

Citing Articles

Identification of major trauma using the simplified abbreviated injury scale to estimate the injury severity score: a diagnostic accuracy and validation study.

Eidenbenz D, Gauss T, Zingg T, Darioli V, Vallot C, Carron P Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025; 33(1):13.

PMID: 39881340 PMC: 11776216. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-025-01320-7.


Trauma Center model application in the University Hospital of Pisa: a single-center comparative study.

Barbieri G, Cipriano A, Coccolini F, Pini S, DellAgnello D, Ranalli A Intern Emerg Med. 2024; 20(1):267-272.

PMID: 38940990 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03644-1.


Research priorities for the management of major trauma: an international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.

Bretherton C, Hirst R, Gacaferi H, Gower J, Exell L, Johnston S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(5):e083450.

PMID: 38754886 PMC: 11107451. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083450.


Indicators for the evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma systems: A scoping review and Delphi study.

Dworkin M, Agarwal-Harding K, Joseph M, Cahill G, Konadu-Yeboah D, Makasa E PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0290816.

PMID: 37651448 PMC: 10470913. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290816.


National Assessment of Opportunities for Improvement in Preventable Trauma Deaths: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Kwon J, Lee M, Jung K Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(16).

PMID: 37628489 PMC: 10454732. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11162291.


References
1.
West J, Trunkey D, Lim R . Systems of trauma care. A study of two counties. Arch Surg. 1979; 114(4):455-60. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370280109016. View

2.
Gruen R, Jurkovich G, McIntyre L, Foy H, Maier R . Patterns of errors contributing to trauma mortality: lessons learned from 2,594 deaths. Ann Surg. 2006; 244(3):371-80. PMC: 1856538. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000234655.83517.56. View

3.
Wyszewianski L, Wheeler J, Donabedian A . Market-oriented cost-containment strategies and quality of care. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1982; 60(4):518-50. View

4.
Gruen R, Gabbe B, Stelfox H, Cameron P . Indicators of the quality of trauma care and the performance of trauma systems. Br J Surg. 2012; 99 Suppl 1:97-104. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7754. View

5.
Donabedian A . Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966; 44(3):Suppl:166-206. View