» Articles » PMID: 33612933

Development and Validation of a Structured Feedback Questionnaire from Postgraduates on Various Elements of Postgraduate Medical Curriculum

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Feb 22
PMID 33612933
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Medical Council of India, introduced the Post Graduate (PG) curriculum as 'Competency Based Medical Education' (CBME). Feedback from the end users is a vital step in curriculum evaluation. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to develop and validate a Structured Feedback Questionnaire (SFQ) for postgraduates, encompassing all the components of the PG-CBME curriculum.

Methods: SFQ was developed with 23 Likert based questions and four open ended questions. Content validation was done by Lawshe method. After getting institutional ethics clearance and informed consent, SFQ was administered to 121 final year PGs (response rate 100%). We performed Principal component analysis (PCA), Structural equation modeling (SEM), Chi squared test (χ/df); goodness-of-fit index (GFI); adjusted GFI; comparative fit index (CFI) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). Cronbach's alpha was done for estimating the internal consistency.

Results: The validation resulted in a three-factor model comprising of "curriculum" (42.1%), "assessment" (28%), and "support" (18.5%). Chi squared test (χ/df ratio) < 2, CFI (0.78), GFI (0.72) and RMSEA (0.09) indicated superior goodness of fit for the three-factor model for the sample data. All the extracted factors had good internal consistency of ≥0.9.

Conclusion: We believe that this 23 item SFQ is a valid and reliable tool which can be utilized for curriculum evaluation and thereby formulating recommendations to modify the existing curriculum wherever required, facilitating enriched program outcomes.

Citing Articles

A survey of attitudes towards the curriculum for clinical medicine postgraduates pursuing professional master's degrees: perspectives of supervisors and students.

Xu R, Wu J, Jin X, Tang M, Pang C, Yang Z Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1488139.

PMID: 39720652 PMC: 11666361. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1488139.


Learning needs of nursing postgraduates in Southwest China based on Hutchinson's learning needs theory: a qualitative research.

Zhang S, Ma H, Zhu X, Niu A, Luo Y BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):223.

PMID: 37029368 PMC: 10081817. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04217-0.


Validation of Expanded form of Lubben Social Network Scale among Community-Dwelling Geriatric Population in India.

Bincy K, Logaraj M, Anatharaman V Indian J Community Med. 2022; 47(2):244-248.

PMID: 36034245 PMC: 9400338. DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_827_21.


Effect of Bhramari Pranayama intervention on stress, anxiety, depression and sleep quality among COVID 19 patients in home isolation.

Jagadeesan T, R A, R K, Jain T, Allu A, Selvi G T J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2022; 13(3):100596.

PMID: 35693195 PMC: 9167919. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2022.100596.

References
1.
Pirie J, St Amant L, Glover Takahashi S . Managing residents in difficulty within CBME residency educational systems: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20(1):235. PMC: 7376876. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02150-0. View

2.
Tavakol M, Dennick R . Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2016; 2:53-55. PMC: 4205511. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd. View

3.
Chen B, Kern D, Kearns R, Thomas P, Hughes M, Tackett S . From Modules to MOOCs: Application of the Six-Step Approach to Online Curriculum Development for Medical Education. Acad Med. 2019; 94(5):678-685. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002580. View

4.
Nievas Soriano B, Garcia Duarte S, Fernandez Alonso A, Bonillo Perales A, Parron Carreno T . Validation of a Questionnaire Developed to Evaluate a Pediatric eHealth Website for Parents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(8). PMC: 7215976. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17082671. View

5.
Jacobs P, Koehn M . Curriculum evaluation. Who, when, why, how?. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2004; 25(1):30-5. View