Does Open Data Boost Journal Impact: Evidence from Chinese Economics

Overview

Journal Scientometrics

Publisher Springer

Date 2021 Feb 22

PMID 33612885

Citations 5

Authors

Liwei Zhang

Liang Ma

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

To encourage research transparency and replication, more and more journals have been requiring authors to share original datasets and analytic procedures supporting their publications. Does open data boost journal impact? In this article, we report one of the first empirical studies to assess the effects of open data on journal impact. China Industrial Economics (CIE) mandated authors to open their research data in the end of 2016, which is the first to embrace open data among Chinese journals and provides a natural experiment for policy evaluation. We use the data of 37 Chinese economics journals from 2001 to 2019 and apply synthetic control method to causally estimate the effects of open data, and our results show that open data has significantly increased the citations of journal articles. On average, the current- and second-year citations of articles published with CIE have increased by 1 ~ 4 times, and articles published before the open data policy also benefited from the spillover effect. Our findings suggest that journals can leverage compulsory open data to develop reputation and amplify academic impacts.

Citing Articles

The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.

Klebel T, Traag V, Grypari I, Stoy L, Ross-Hellauer T R Soc Open Sci. 2025; 12(3):241248.

PMID: 40046663 PMC: 11879623. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241248.

Precision medicine in Asia enhanced by next-generation sequencing: Implications for Thailand through a scoping review and interview study.

Phanthunane C, Pongcharoen S, Pannarunothai S, Roboon J, Phanthunane P, Nontarak J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 17(6):e13868.

PMID: 38924657 PMC: 11197108. DOI: 10.1111/cts.13868.

A survey of experimental stimulus presentation code sharing in major areas of psychology.

Rawal A, Truong V, Lo Y, Tseng L, Duncan N Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(7):6781-6791.

PMID: 38627322 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02390-8.

Is open science a double-edged sword?: data sharing and the changing citation pattern of Chinese economics articles.

Zhang L, Ma L Scientometrics. 2023; 128(5):2803-2818.

PMID: 37101973 PMC: 10028759. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-023-04684-8.

Open data and data sharing in articles about COVID-19 published in preprint servers medRxiv and bioRxiv.

Strcic J, civljak A, Glozinic T, Pacheco R, Brkovic T, Puljak L Scientometrics. 2022; 127(5):2791-2802.

PMID: 35370324 PMC: 8956135. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04346-1.

References

Piwowar H, Chapman W . Public sharing of research datasets: a pilot study of associations. J Informetr. 2011; 4(2):148-156. PMC: 3039489. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.11.010. View

Lee S, Turchiano G, Ata H, Nowsheen S, Romito M, Lou Z . Failure to detect DNA-guided genome editing using Natronobacterium gregoryi Argonaute. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 35(1):17-18. PMC: 5662444. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3753. View

Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu A, Wu L, Read E . Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS One. 2011; 6(6):e21101. PMC: 3126798. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101. View

Whitlock M . Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010; 26(2):61-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.006. View

Gotzsche P . Strengthening and opening up health research by sharing our raw data. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012; 5(2):236-7. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965277. View

Javidi-Parsijani P, Niu G, Davis M, Lu P, Atala A, Lu B . No evidence of genome editing activity from Natronobacterium gregoryi Argonaute (NgAgo) in human cells. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0177444. PMC: 5426773. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177444. View

Krumholz H . Open science and data sharing in clinical research: basing informed decisions on the totality of the evidence. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012; 5(2):141-2. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965848. View

Schmidt B, Gemeinholzer B, Treloar A . Open Data in Global Environmental Research: The Belmont Forum's Open Data Survey. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0146695. PMC: 4714918. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146695. View

McKiernan E, Bourne P, Brown C, Buck S, Kenall A, Lin J . How open science helps researchers succeed. Elife. 2016; 5. PMC: 4973366. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.16800. View

10.

Yang W . Research integrity in China. Science. 2013; 342(6162):1019. DOI: 10.1126/science.1247700. View

11.

Whitlock M, McPeek M, Rausher M, Rieseberg L, Moore A . Data archiving. Am Nat. 2010; 175(2):145-6. DOI: 10.1086/650340. View

12.

Molloy J . The Open Knowledge Foundation: open data means better science. PLoS Biol. 2011; 9(12):e1001195. PMC: 3232214. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001195. View

13.

Gymrek M, Farjoun Y . Recommendations for open data science. Gigascience. 2016; 5:22. PMC: 4870738. DOI: 10.1186/s13742-016-0127-4. View

14.

Piwowar H, Day R, Fridsma D . Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS One. 2007; 2(3):e308. PMC: 1817752. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000308. View

15.

Campbell E, Bendavid E . Data-sharing and data-withholding in genetics and the life sciences: results of a national survey of technology transfer officers. J Health Care Law Policy. 2004; 6(2):241-55. View

16.

Peng R . Reproducible research in computational science. Science. 2011; 334(6060):1226-7. PMC: 3383002. DOI: 10.1126/science.1213847. View

17.

Reichman O, Jones M, Schildhauer M . Challenges and opportunities of open data in ecology. Science. 2011; 331(6018):703-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1197962. View

18.

Tang L . Five ways China must cultivate research integrity. Nature. 2019; 575(7784):589-591. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-03613-1. View

19.

Christensen G, Dafoe A, Miguel E, Moore D, Rose A . A study of the impact of data sharing on article citations using journal policies as a natural experiment. PLoS One. 2019; 14(12):e0225883. PMC: 6919593. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225883. View

20.

Campbell E, Clarridge B, Gokhale M, Birenbaum L, Hilgartner S, Holtzman N . Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. JAMA. 2002; 287(4):473-80. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.4.473. View