» Articles » PMID: 33607120

Use of Nonpreferred Contraceptive Methods Among Women in Ohio

Overview
Journal Contraception
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2021 Feb 19
PMID 33607120
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We describe the prevalence and correlates of nonuse of preferred contraceptive method among women 18-44 years of age in Ohio using contraception.

Study Design: The population-representative Ohio Survey of Women had 2529 participants in 2018-2019, with a response rate of 33.5%. We examined prevalence of preferred method nonuse, reasons for nonuse, and satisfaction with current method among current contraception users (n = 1390). We evaluated associations between demographic and healthcare factors and preferred method nonuse.

Results: About 25% of women reported not using their preferred contraceptive method. The most common barrier to obtaining preferred method was affordability (13%). Those not using their preferred method identified long-acting methods (49%), oral contraception (33%), or condoms (21%) as their preferred methods. The proportion using their preferred method was highest among intrauterine device (IUD) users (86%) and lowest among emergency contraception users (64%). About 16% of women using permanent contraception reported it was not their preferred method. Having the lowest socioeconomic status (versus highest) (prevalence ratio [PR]: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.11-1.96), Hispanic ethnicity (versus non-Hispanic white) (PR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.15-2.90), reporting poor provider satisfaction related to contraceptive care (PR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.02-5.29), and not having a yearly women's checkup (PR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.68) were significantly associated with nonuse of preferred method. Compared to preferred-method nonusers, higher proportions of preferred-method users reported consistent contraceptive use (89% vs. 73%, p < 0.001) and intent to continue use (79% vs. 58%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Affordability and poor provider satisfaction related to contraceptive care were associated with nonuse of preferred contraceptive method. Those using their preferred method reported more consistent use.

Implications: Cost is an important barrier for women in obtaining their preferred contraceptive methods. Low quality birth control care may also be a barrier to preferred-method use. Removal of cost barriers and improvement in contraceptive counseling strategies may increase access to preferred contraceptive methods.

Citing Articles

Patient and obstetrician-gynecologist perspectives on considering long-acting reversible contraception for postpartum patients who desire permanent contraception.

Thornton M, Bullington B, Berg K, White K, Larkin S, Boozer M Contraception. 2024; 143:110781.

PMID: 39643255 PMC: 11798689. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110781.


Differential associations between experiences of contraceptive care and subsequent contraceptive access and preferences among family planning patients by racial and ethnic identity: Evidence from Arizona, Iowa, and Wisconsin.

Kavanaugh M, Haas M, Douglas-Hall A PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0312111.

PMID: 39392846 PMC: 11469507. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312111.


Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study.

Thornton M, Mann E, Bullington B, Hartheimer J, Arora K, Allison B Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024; 56(4):337-346.

PMID: 39175306 PMC: 11649482. DOI: 10.1111/psrh.12283.


Declines in Non-marital Births Among Black Women Between 2004 and 2014: Are Recent Trends the Result of Increases in Contraception?.

Burke K, Raley R Popul Res Policy Rev. 2024; 41(5):2267-2288.

PMID: 39006865 PMC: 11244848. DOI: 10.1007/s11113-022-09724-4.


Trends in Continuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescents Receiving Medicaid.

Allison B, Ritter V, Lin F, Flower K, Perry M J Adolesc Health. 2024; 75(3):487-495.

PMID: 38980246 PMC: 11330372. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.04.029.


References
1.
Norris A, Chakraborty P, Lang K, Hood R, Hayford S, Keder L . Abortion Access in Ohio's Changing Legislative Context, 2010-2018. Am J Public Health. 2020; 110(8):1228-1234. PMC: 7349452. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305706. View

2.
Burke K, Potter J, White K . Unsatisfied contraceptive preferences due to cost among women in the United States. Contracept X. 2020; 2:100032. PMC: 7378558. DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100032. View

3.
Peipert J, Madden T, Allsworth J, Secura G . Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120(6):1291-7. PMC: 4000282. DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318273eb56. View

4.
Lessard L, Karasek D, Ma S, Darney P, Deardorff J, Lahiff M . Contraceptive features preferred by women at high risk of unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44(3):194-200. DOI: 10.1363/4419412. View

5.
Hathaway M, Torres L, Vollett-Krech J, Wohltjen H . Increasing LARC utilization: any woman, any place, any time. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 57(4):718-30. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000071. View