» Articles » PMID: 33607088

Clinical Outcomes in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Presentations in GARFIELD-AF: Implications for AF Screening

Overview
Journal Am J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Feb 19
PMID 33607088
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation is often detected incidentally. Prognosis and optimal therapy for asymptomatic compared with symptomatic atrial fibrillation is uncertain. This study compares clinical characteristics, treatment, and 2-year outcomes of asymptomatic and symptomatic atrial fibrillation presentations.

Methods: Global Anticoagulant Registry in the Field-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) is a global, prospective, observational study of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation with ≥1 stroke risk factors (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, unique identifier: NCT01090362). Patients were characterized by atrial fibrillation-related symptoms at presentation and the CHADS-VASc score. Two-year follow-up recorded anticoagulation patterns (vitamin K antagonist, direct oral anticoagulants, parenteral therapy) and outcomes (stroke/systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and bleeding).

Results: At presentation, of 52,032 eligible patients, 25.4% were asymptomatic and 74.6% symptomatic. Asymptomatic patients were slightly older (72 vs 70 years), more often male (64.2% vs 52.9%), and more frequently initiated on anticoagulation ± antiplatelets (69.4% vs 66.0%). No difference in events (adjusted hazard ratios, 95% confidence interval) for nonhemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism (1.19, 0.97-1.45), all-cause mortality (1.06, 0.94-1.20), or bleeding (1.02, 0.87-1.19) was observed. Anticoagulation was associated with comparable reduction in nonhemorrhagic stroke/systemic embolism (0.59, 0.43-0.82 vs 0.78, 0.65-0.93) and all-cause mortality (0.69, 0.59-0.81 vs 0.77, 0.71-0.85) in asymptomatic versus symptomatic, respectively.

Conclusions: Major outcomes do not differ between asymptomatic and symptomatic atrial fibrillation presentations and are comparably reduced by anticoagulation. Opportunistic screening-detected asymptomatic atrial fibrillation likely has the same prognosis as asymptomatic atrial fibrillation at presentation and likely responds similarly to anticoagulation thromboprophylaxis.

Citing Articles

Adherence to integrated care using the 'Atrial fibrillation Better Care' pathway in asymptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation improves clinical outcomes: A report from the prospective COOL-AF registry.

Kaolawanich Y, Winijkul A, Yindeengam A, Sairat P, Lip G, Krittayaphong R Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41586.

PMID: 39850421 PMC: 11755037. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41586.


Screening and detection of atrial fibrillation in primary care: current practice and future perspectives.

Brik T, Harskamp R, Himmelreich J Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024; 26(Suppl 4):iv12-iv18.

PMID: 39099572 PMC: 11292407. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae074.


A danish healthcare-focused economic evaluation of first-line cryoballoon ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Hansen M, Moss J, Tonnesen J, Johansen M, Kuniss M, Ismyrloglou E BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024; 24(1):363.

PMID: 39014312 PMC: 11251117. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-024-04024-5.


Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation.

Ma C, Wu S, Liu S, Han Y J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024; 21(3):251-314.

PMID: 38665287 PMC: 11040055. DOI: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.03.009.


An Economic Evaluation of a Streamlined Day-Case Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Protocol and Conventional Cryoballoon Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs in a UK Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Population.

Moss J, Todd D, Grodzicki L, Palazzolo B, Mattock R, Mealing S Pharmacoecon Open. 2024; 8(3):417-429.

PMID: 38244143 PMC: 11058164. DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00471-6.