» Articles » PMID: 33606657

Evidence Synthesis of Digital Interventions to Mitigate the Negative Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Public Mental Health: Rapid Meta-review

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2021 Feb 19
PMID 33606657
Citations 87
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accumulating evidence suggests the COVID-19 pandemic has negative effects on public mental health. Digital interventions that have been developed and evaluated in recent years may be used to mitigate the negative consequences of the pandemic. However, evidence-based recommendations on the use of existing telemedicine and internet-based (eHealth) and app-based mobile health (mHealth) interventions are lacking.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the theoretical and empirical base, user perspective, safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of digital interventions related to public mental health provision (ie, mental health promotion, prevention, and treatment of mental disorders) that may help to reduce the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: A rapid meta-review was conducted. The MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL databases were searched on May 11, 2020. Study inclusion criteria were broad and considered systematic reviews and meta-analyses that investigated digital tools for health promotion, prevention, or treatment of mental health conditions and determinants likely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: Overall, 815 peer-reviewed systematic reviews and meta-analyses were identified, of which 83 met the inclusion criteria. Our findings suggest that there is good evidence on the usability, safety, acceptance/satisfaction, and effectiveness of eHealth interventions. Evidence on mHealth apps is promising, especially if social components (eg, blended care) and strategies to promote adherence are incorporated. Although most digital interventions focus on the prevention or treatment of mental disorders, there is some evidence on mental health promotion. However, evidence on process quality, cost-effectiveness, and long-term effects is very limited.

Conclusions: There is evidence that digital interventions are particularly suited to mitigating psychosocial consequences at the population level. In times of physical distancing, quarantine, and restrictions on social contacts, decision makers should develop digital strategies for continued mental health care and invest time and efforts in the development and implementation of mental health promotion and prevention programs.

Citing Articles

Characteristics of suicide prevention apps: a content analysis of apps available in Canada and the UK.

Bennett-Poynter L, Groves S, Kemp J, Shin H, Sequeira L, Lascelles K BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e087468.

PMID: 39788769 PMC: 11751985. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087468.


Occupational health professionals' and HR specialists' perceptions of telemental health services in occupational health care settings: A qualitative study.

Kervinen E, Vahatalo L, Siukola A, Reho T, Winell K, Sauni R Digit Health. 2025; 11():20552076241297409.

PMID: 39777057 PMC: 11705330. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241297409.


Improving Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Bibliometric Analysis of Related Intervention Studies.

Chen G, Chen W, Qi S, Shek D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 21(12.

PMID: 39767418 PMC: 11675629. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121576.


Hybrid Service Delivery for voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations working with adults with learning disabilities and/or autism: a realist review protocol.

Varley D, Southby K, Trigwell J, Brown S, Lines N, Hearn A Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):316.

PMID: 39731195 PMC: 11673684. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02732-9.


Acceptability, User Satisfaction, and Feasibility of an App-Based Support Service During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Psychiatric Outpatient Setting: Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study.

Golsong K, Kaufmann L, Baldofski S, Kohls E, Rummel-Kluge C JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e60461.

PMID: 39630503 PMC: 11656116. DOI: 10.2196/60461.


References
1.
Yao H, Chen J, Xu Y . Patients with mental health disorders in the COVID-19 epidemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7(4):e21. PMC: 7269717. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30090-0. View

2.
Kramer U, Borges U, Fischer F, Hoffmann W, Pobiruchin M, Vollmar H . [DNVF-Memorandum - Health and Medical Apps]. Gesundheitswesen. 2019; 81(10):e154-e170. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667451. View

3.
Rauschenberg C, Schick A, Goetzl C, Roehr S, Riedel-Heller S, Koppe G . Social isolation, mental health, and use of digital interventions in youth during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationally representative survey. Eur Psychiatry. 2021; 64(1):e20. PMC: 7985650. DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.17. View

4.
O Rourke L, Humphris G, Baldacchino A . Electronic communication based interventions for hazardous young drinkers: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016; 68:880-890. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.021. View

5.
Lau P, Lau E, Wong D, Ransdell L . A systematic review of information and communication technology-based interventions for promoting physical activity behavior change in children and adolescents. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(3):e48. PMC: 3222183. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1533. View