» Articles » PMID: 33606599

Use and Evaluation of Assistive Technologies for Upper Limb Function in Tetraplegia

Overview
Date 2021 Feb 19
PMID 33606599
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: More than half of all spinal cord injuries (SCI) occur at the cervical level leading to loss of upper limb function, restricted activity and reduced independence. Several technologies have been developed to assist with upper limb functions in the SCI population.

Objective: There is no clear clinical consensus on the effectiveness of the current assistive technologies for the cervical SCI population, hence this study reviews the literature in the years between 1999 and 2019.

Methods: A systematic review was performed on the state-of-the-art assistive technology that supports and improves the function of impaired upper limbs in cervical SCI populations. Combinations of terms, covering assistive technology, SCI, and upper limb, were used in the search, which resulted in a total of 1770 articles. Data extractions were performed on the selected studies which involved summarizing details on the assistive technologies, characteristics of study participants, outcome measures, and improved upper limb functions when using the device.

Results: A total of 24 articles were found and grouped into five categories, including neuroprostheses (invasive and non-invasive), orthotic devices, hybrid systems, robots, and arm supports. Only a few selected studies comprehensively reported characteristics of the participants. There was a wide range of outcome measures and all studies reported improvements in upper limb function with the devices.

Conclusions: This study highlighted that assistive technologies can improve functions of the upper limbs in SCI patients. It was challenging to draw generalizable conclusions because of factors, such as heterogeneity of recruited participants, a wide range of outcome measures, and the different technologies employed.

Citing Articles

Sensorless model-based tension control for a cable-driven exosuit.

Bardi E, Esser A, Wolf P, Gandolla M, Ambrosini E, Pedrocchi A Wearable Technol. 2025; 5():e22.

PMID: 39811475 PMC: 11729527. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2024.21.


DiSCIoser: unlocking recovery potential of arm sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury by promoting activity-dependent brain plasticity by means of brain-computer interface technology: a randomized controlled trial to test efficacy.

Colamarino E, Lorusso M, Pichiorri F, Toppi J, Tamburella F, Serratore G BMC Neurol. 2023; 23(1):414.

PMID: 37990160 PMC: 10662594. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03442-w.


Development and Use of Assistive Technologies in Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review of Reviews on the Evolution, Opportunities, and Bottlenecks of Their Integration in the Health Domain.

Morone G, Pirrera A, Iannone A, Giansanti D Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(11).

PMID: 37297786 PMC: 10252185. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11111646.


User Based Development and Test of the EXOTIC Exoskeleton: Empowering Individuals with Tetraplegia Using a Compact, Versatile, 5-DoF Upper Limb Exoskeleton Controlled through Intelligent Semi-Automated Shared Tongue Control.

Thogersen M, Mohammadi M, Gull M, Bengtson S, Kobbelgaard F, Bentsen B Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(18).

PMID: 36146260 PMC: 9502221. DOI: 10.3390/s22186919.

References
1.
Gall A, Turner-Stokes L . Chronic spinal cord injury: management of patients in acute hospital settings. Clin Med (Lond). 2008; 8(1):70-4. PMC: 4953716. DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.8-1-70. View

2.
Cortes M, Elder J, Rykman A, Murray L, Avedissian M, Stampas A . Improved motor performance in chronic spinal cord injury following upper-limb robotic training. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013; 33(1):57-65. PMC: 4519228. DOI: 10.3233/NRE-130928. View

3.
Taylor P, Esnouf J, Hobby J . The functional impact of the Freehand System on tetraplegic hand function. Clinical Results. Spinal Cord. 2002; 40(11):560-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101373. View

4.
Gan L, Ravid E, Kowalczewski J, Olson J, Morhart M, Prochazka A . First permanent implant of nerve stimulation leads activated by surface electrodes, enabling hand grasp and release: the stimulus router neuroprosthesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 26(4):335-43. DOI: 10.1177/1545968311420443. View

5.
Noonan V, Fallah N, Park S, Dumont F, Leblond J, Cobb J . Health care utilization in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury: the importance of multimorbidity and the impact on patient outcomes. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014; 20(4):289-301. PMC: 4252129. DOI: 10.1310/sci2004-289. View