Patient-reported Outcomes in Vaccines Research: Relevance for Decision-making
Overview
Affiliations
The development and demand for effective vaccines have witnessed an exponential growth over the last century. In the meantime, the vaccine market involves more knowledgeable stakeholders, with a shift in emphasis by regulatory agencies on understanding the patient perception and experience. The Food and Drug Administration's publication of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) guidance has elevated the discipline of PROs and has resulted in a transition from clinician reports of patient outcomes to PROs. This review reports various research methods, which utilize PROs, including qualitative and quantitative research, clinical trials, and patient preference studies. With the advancement of electronic PRO data capture, additional advantages of PROs are being observed and utilized (e.g. as a trigger for clinical endpoints). We discuss uses and advantages of including PROs into the clinical trial program to improve efficiencies, clinical relevance and overall validity of the program in the vaccine field. (See Plain Language Summary).
Ensuring equity with pre-clinical planning for chlamydia vaccines.
Collar A, Clarke T, Jamus A, Frietze K NPJ Vaccines. 2023; 8(1):131.
PMID: 37673890 PMC: 10482967. DOI: 10.1038/s41541-023-00726-7.
Vaccines - beliefs and concerns: the voice of patients with inflammatory immunomediated diseases.
Abreu C, Martins A, Branco E, Rocha R, Sarmento A, Magro F Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023; 35(8):848-853.
PMID: 37395237 PMC: 10476580. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002589.
Di Fusco M, Sun X, Moran M, Coetzer H, Zamparo J, Puzniak L J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022; 6(1):123.
PMID: 36469198 PMC: 9722994. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00528-w.