» Articles » PMID: 33606595

Patient-reported Outcomes in Vaccines Research: Relevance for Decision-making

Overview
Date 2021 Feb 19
PMID 33606595
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The development and demand for effective vaccines have witnessed an exponential growth over the last century. In the meantime, the vaccine market involves more knowledgeable stakeholders, with a shift in emphasis by regulatory agencies on understanding the patient perception and experience. The Food and Drug Administration's publication of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) guidance has elevated the discipline of PROs and has resulted in a transition from clinician reports of patient outcomes to PROs. This review reports various research methods, which utilize PROs, including qualitative and quantitative research, clinical trials, and patient preference studies. With the advancement of electronic PRO data capture, additional advantages of PROs are being observed and utilized (e.g. as a trigger for clinical endpoints). We discuss uses and advantages of including PROs into the clinical trial program to improve efficiencies, clinical relevance and overall validity of the program in the vaccine field. (See Plain Language Summary).

Citing Articles

Ensuring equity with pre-clinical planning for chlamydia vaccines.

Collar A, Clarke T, Jamus A, Frietze K NPJ Vaccines. 2023; 8(1):131.

PMID: 37673890 PMC: 10482967. DOI: 10.1038/s41541-023-00726-7.


Vaccines - beliefs and concerns: the voice of patients with inflammatory immunomediated diseases.

Abreu C, Martins A, Branco E, Rocha R, Sarmento A, Magro F Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023; 35(8):848-853.

PMID: 37395237 PMC: 10476580. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002589.


Impact of COVID-19 and effects of BNT162b2 on patient-reported outcomes: quality of life, symptoms, and work productivity among US adult outpatients.

Di Fusco M, Sun X, Moran M, Coetzer H, Zamparo J, Puzniak L J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022; 6(1):123.

PMID: 36469198 PMC: 9722994. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00528-w.

References
1.
Revicki D, Gnanasakthy A, Weinfurt K . Documenting the rationale and psychometric characteristics of patient reported outcomes for labeling and promotional claims: the PRO Evidence Dossier. Qual Life Res. 2007; 16(4):717-23. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-006-9153-5. View

2.
Callegaro A, Curran D, Matthews S . Burden-of-illness vaccine efficacy. Pharm Stat. 2020; 19(5):636-645. PMC: 9291914. DOI: 10.1002/pst.2020. View

3.
Rappuoli R, De Gregorio E . Editorial overview: Vaccines: novel technologies for vaccine development. Curr Opin Immunol. 2016; 41:v-vii. DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2016.07.001. View

4.
Curran D, Andrew M, Levin M, Turriani E, Matthews S, Fogarty C . Evaluation of two frailty indices, with practical application in a vaccine clinical trial. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019; 15(12):2960-2968. PMC: 6930102. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1622974. View

5.
Vesikari T, Giaquinto C, Huppertz H . Clinical trials of rotavirus vaccines in Europe. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006; 25(1 Suppl):S42-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.inf.0000197565.45345.4e. View