» Articles » PMID: 33604299

The Essential Role of Open Data and Software for the Future of Ultrasound-Based Neuronavigation

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Feb 19
PMID 33604299
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the recent developments in machine learning and modern graphics processing units (GPUs), there is a marked shift in the way intra-operative ultrasound (iUS) images can be processed and presented during surgery. Real-time processing of images to highlight important anatomical structures combined with in-situ display, has the potential to greatly facilitate the acquisition and interpretation of iUS images when guiding an operation. In order to take full advantage of the recent advances in machine learning, large amounts of high-quality annotated training data are necessary to develop and validate the algorithms. To ensure efficient collection of a sufficient number of patient images and external validity of the models, training data should be collected at several centers by different neurosurgeons, and stored in a standard format directly compatible with the most commonly used machine learning toolkits and libraries. In this paper, we argue that such effort to collect and organize large-scale multi-center datasets should be based on common open source software and databases. We first describe the development of existing open-source ultrasound based neuronavigation systems and how these systems have contributed to enhanced neurosurgical guidance over the last 15 years. We review the impact of the large number of projects worldwide that have benefited from the publicly available datasets "Brain Images of Tumors for Evaluation" (BITE) and "Retrospective evaluation of Cerebral Tumors" (RESECT) that include MR and US data from brain tumor cases. We also describe the need for continuous data collection and how this effort can be organized through the use of a well-adapted and user-friendly open-source software platform that integrates both continually improved guidance and automated data collection functionalities.

Citing Articles

The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.

Klebel T, Traag V, Grypari I, Stoy L, Ross-Hellauer T R Soc Open Sci. 2025; 12(3):241248.

PMID: 40046663 PMC: 11879623. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241248.

References
1.
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J, Pujol S . 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 30(9):1323-41. PMC: 3466397. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001. View

2.
Lervik Bakeng J, Hofstad E, Solberg O, Eiesland J, Tangen G, Amundsen T . Using the CustusX toolkit to create an image guided bronchoscopy application: Fraxinus. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0211772. PMC: 6368291. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211772. View

3.
Rivaz H, Collins D . Near real-time robust non-rigid registration of volumetric ultrasound images for neurosurgery. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014; 41(2):574-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.08.013. View

4.
Aarestrup F, Albeyatti A, Armitage W, Auffray C, Augello L, Balling R . Towards a European health research and innovation cloud (HRIC). Genome Med. 2020; 12(1):18. PMC: 7029532. DOI: 10.1186/s13073-020-0713-z. View

5.
Xiao Y, Fortin M, Unsgard G, Rivaz H, Reinertsen I . REtroSpective Evaluation of Cerebral Tumors (RESECT): A clinical database of pre-operative MRI and intra-operative ultrasound in low-grade glioma surgeries. Med Phys. 2017; 44(7):3875-3882. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12268. View