» Articles » PMID: 33603709

Social Network Structure Is Related to Functional Improvement From Home-Based Telerehabilitation After Stroke

Abstract

Telerehabilitation (TR) is now, in the context of COVID-19, more clinically relevant than ever as a major source of outpatient care. The social network of a patient is a critical yet understudied factor in the success of TR that may influence both engagement in therapy programs and post-stroke outcomes. We designed a 12-week home-based TR program for stroke patients and evaluated which social factors might be related to motor gains and reduced depressive symptoms. Stroke patients ( = 13) with arm motor deficits underwent supervised home-based TR for 12 weeks with routine assessments of motor function and mood. At the 6-week midpoint, we mapped each patient's personal social network and evaluated relationships between social network metrics and functional improvements from TR. Finally, we compared social networks of TR patients with a historical cohort of 176 stroke patients who did not receive any TR to identify social network differences. Both network size and network density were related to walk time improvement ( = 0.025; = 0.003). Social network density was related to arm motor gains ( = 0.003). Social network size was related to reduced depressive symptoms ( = 0.015). TR patient networks were larger ( = 0.012) and less dense ( = 0.046) than historical stroke control networks. Social network structure is positively related to improvement in motor status and mood from TR. TR patients had larger and more open social networks than stroke patients who did not receive TR. Understanding how social networks intersect with TR outcomes is crucial to maximize effects of virtual rehabilitation.

Citing Articles

Synchronous Home-Based Telerehabilitation of the Upper Extremity Following Stroke-A Pyramid Review.

Stangenberg-Gliss K, Kopkow C, Borgetto B Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(1.

PMID: 39791697 PMC: 11720659. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13010090.


Cognitive telerehabilitation: an expert consensus paper on current evidence and future perspective.

Maggio M, Baglio F, Arcuri F, Borgnis F, Contrada M, Diaz M Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1338873.

PMID: 38426164 PMC: 10902044. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1338873.


How Social Connection and Engagement Relate to Functional Limitations and Depressive Symptoms Outcomes After Stroke.

Elayoubi J, Haley W, Nelson M, Hueluer G Stroke. 2023; 54(7):1830-1838.

PMID: 37363947 PMC: 10313154. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.042386.


Automatic theranostics for long-term neurorehabilitation after stroke.

Zhou S, Zhang J, Chen F, Wong T, Ng S, Li Z Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1154795.

PMID: 37261267 PMC: 10228725. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1154795.


"How Social Connection and Engagement Relate to Functional Limitations and Depressive Symptoms Outcomes After Stroke".

Elayoubi J, Haley W, Nelson M, Hueluer G medRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 36945464 PMC: 10029024. DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.07.23286965.


References
1.
Vemmos K, Zakopoulos N, Stamatelopoulos S . First-stroke recovery process: the role of family social support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81(7):881-7. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2000.4435. View

2.
Bauler S, Jacquin-Courtois S, Haesebaert J, Luaute J, Coudeyre E, Feutrier C . Barriers and facilitators for medication adherence in stroke patients: a qualitative study conducted in French neurological rehabilitation units. Eur Neurol. 2014; 72(5-6):262-70. DOI: 10.1159/000362718. View

3.
Menon A, Bitensky N, Straus S . Best practise use in stroke rehabilitation: from trials and tribulations to solutions!. Disabil Rehabil. 2010; 32(8):646-9. DOI: 10.3109/09638280903214640. View

4.
Hatem S, Saussez G, Della Faille M, Prist V, Zhang X, Dispa D . Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:442. PMC: 5020059. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442. View

5.
Glass T, Matchar D, Belyea M, Feussner J . Impact of social support on outcome in first stroke. Stroke. 1993; 24(1):64-70. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.64. View