» Articles » PMID: 33597560

Deep Learning Identifies Morphological Features in Breast Cancer Predictive of Cancer ERBB2 Status and Trastuzumab Treatment Efficacy

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Feb 18
PMID 33597560
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The treatment of patients with ERBB2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer with anti-ERBB2 therapy is based on the detection of ERBB2 gene amplification or protein overexpression. Machine learning (ML) algorithms can predict the amplification of ERBB2 based on tumor morphological features, but it is not known whether ML-derived features can predict survival and efficacy of anti-ERBB2 treatment. In this study, we trained a deep learning model with digital images of hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained formalin-fixed primary breast tumor tissue sections, weakly supervised by ERBB2 gene amplification status. The gene amplification was determined by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). The training data comprised digitized tissue microarray (TMA) samples from 1,047 patients. The correlation between the deep learning-predicted ERBB2 status, which we call H&E-ERBB2 score, and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was investigated on a fully independent test set, which included whole-slide tumor images from 712 patients with trastuzumab treatment status available. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in predicting gene amplification in the test sets was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.77) on 354 TMA samples and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62-0.71) on 712 whole-slide images. Among patients with ERBB2-positive cancer treated with trastuzumab, those with a higher than the median morphology-based H&E-ERBB2 score derived from machine learning had more favorable DDFS than those with a lower score (hazard ratio [HR] 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.93; P = 0.034). A high H&E-ERBB2 score was associated with unfavorable survival in patients with ERBB2-negative cancer as determined by CISH. ERBB2-associated morphology correlated with the efficacy of adjuvant anti-ERBB2 treatment and can contribute to treatment-predictive information in breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Development of metastasis and survival prediction model of luminal and non-luminal breast cancer with weakly supervised learning based on pathomics.

Liu H, Ying L, Song X, Xiang X, Wei S PeerJ. 2025; 13:e18780.

PMID: 39866573 PMC: 11759606. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18780.


Deep learning-based prediction of HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment efficacy of gastric adenocarcinoma based on morphological features.

Wu Z, Wang T, Lan J, Wang J, Chen G, Tong T J Transl Med. 2025; 23(1):13.

PMID: 39762854 PMC: 11702172. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-06034-5.


Deep Learning Predicts Subtype Heterogeneity and Outcomes in Luminal A Breast Cancer Using Routinely Stained Whole-Slide Images.

Kurian N, Gann P, Kumar N, McGregor S, Verma R, Sethi A Cancer Res Commun. 2024; 5(1):157-166.

PMID: 39740059 PMC: 11770635. DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0397.


Clinical utility of receptor status prediction in breast cancer and misdiagnosis identification using deep learning on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides.

Shamai G, Schley R, Cretu A, Neoran T, Sabo E, Binenbaum Y Commun Med (Lond). 2024; 4(1):276.

PMID: 39706861 PMC: 11661999. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00695-5.


Explainable breast cancer molecular expression prediction using multi-task deep-learning based on 3D whole breast ultrasound.

Huang Z, Zhang X, Ju Y, Zhang G, Chang W, Song H Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):227.

PMID: 39320560 PMC: 11424596. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01810-9.


References
1.
Campanella G, Hanna M, Geneslaw L, Miraflor A, Silva V, Busam K . Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images. Nat Med. 2019; 25(8):1301-1309. PMC: 7418463. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0508-1. View

2.
Wolff A, Hammond M, Allison K, Harvey B, Mangu P, Bartlett J . Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(20):2105-2122. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8738. View

3.
Skrede O, de Raedt S, Kleppe A, Hveem T, Liestol K, Maddison J . Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10221):350-360. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32998-8. View

4.
Mobadersany P, Yousefi S, Amgad M, Gutman D, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Velazquez Vega J . Predicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(13):E2970-E2979. PMC: 5879673. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1717139115. View

5.
Joensuu H, Bono P, Kataja V, Alanko T, Kokko R, Asola R . Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide with either docetaxel or vinorelbine, with or without trastuzumab, as adjuvant treatments of breast cancer: final results of the FinHer Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(34):5685-92. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4577. View