» Articles » PMID: 33595100

Impact of the Combined Use of Intracardiac Ultrasound and a Steerable Sheath Visualized by a 3D Mapping System on Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Overview
Date 2021 Feb 17
PMID 33595100
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A novel steerable sheath visualized on a three-dimensional mapping system has become available in this era in which a durable pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) with reduced fluoroscopy is required.

Methods: In 60 patients who underwent a PVI with a visualized sheath (n = 30) and non-visualized conventional sheath (n = 30), the fluoroscopic time and catheter stability during the PVI were analyzed.

Results: The fluoroscopic time during the transseptal access (0 [0, 0.1] vs. 1.4 [0.8, 2.3] minutes, P < .001) and PVI (0 [0, 0.1] vs. 0.4 [0.2, 1.1] minutes, P < .001) were shorter in the visualized sheath group than conventional sheath group. The procedure time during the PVI (32.0 [26.8, 36.3] vs. 41.0 [31.8, 47.3] minutes, P = .01), particularly during the right PVI (15.0 [12.8, 18.0] vs. 23.0 [15.8, 26.3] minutes, P = .009), was shorter in the visualized sheath group than conventional sheath group, however, that during the other steps was equivalent. The standard deviation of the catheter contact force during each radiofrequency application was smaller in the visualized sheath group than conventional sheath group (4.5 ± 2.7 vs. 4.9 ± 3.1 g, P = .001). The impedance drop for each lesion was larger in the visualized sheath group than conventional sheath group (10.7 ± 6.5 vs. 9.8 ± 5.5 ohms, P < .001). The incidence of acute PV reconnections per patient (30% vs. 23%, P = .56) and per PV segment (2.5% vs. 2.3%, P = .83) were similar between the two groups. No major complications occurred in either sheath group.

Conclusions: The use of visualized sheaths may reduce the fluoroscopic time and improve the catheter stability during the PVI.

Citing Articles

Workflow of the zero-fluoro pulsed field ablation.

Hirata S, Nagashima K, Watanabe R, Wakamatsu Y, Hirata M, Kurokawa S J Arrhythm. 2024; 40(6):1529-1532.

PMID: 39669927 PMC: 11632259. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13174.


Ablation apprentices and their first experience of pulmonary vein isolation procedure on paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with different sheaths.

Liu Y, Song J, Wang S, Liu L, Liu X, Liu Z J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 19(1):437.

PMID: 38997733 PMC: 11245845. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02826-4.


Difference in radiofrequency ablation profile between during sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation: Considerations in this era of high-power short-duration strategy.

Hara S, Kusa S, Sato Y, Ohya H, Miwa N, Hirano H J Arrhythm. 2024; 40(3):448-454.

PMID: 38939764 PMC: 11199806. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13025.


Comparison of safety and effectiveness of different sheaths in ablation of focal atrial tachycardia: a retrospective study.

Xie M, Liu D, Jia R, Bai Y, Chan J, Lin Z J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(3):2011-2018.

PMID: 38617770 PMC: 11009573. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-52.


High efficiency single-catheter workflow for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation in the QDOT catheter era.

Valeriano C, Buytaert D, Fabbricatore D, De Schouwer K, Addeo L, De Braekeleer L J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023; 67(4):817-826.

PMID: 38092999 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01709-3.