» Articles » PMID: 33594576

Exclusion in the Field: Wild Brown Skuas Find Hidden Food in the Absence of Visual Information

Overview
Journal Anim Cogn
Publisher Springer
Date 2021 Feb 17
PMID 33594576
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Inferential reasoning by exclusion allows responding adaptively to various environmental stimuli when confronted with inconsistent or partial information. In the experimental context, this mechanism involves selecting correctly between an empty option and a potentially rewarded one. Recently, the increasing reports of this capacity in phylogenetically distant species have led to the assumption that reasoning by exclusion is the result of convergent evolution. Within one largely unstudied avian order, i.e. the Charadriiformes, brown skuas (Catharacta antarctica ssp lonnbergi) are highly flexible and opportunistic predators. Behavioural flexibility, along with specific aspects of skuas' feeding ecology, may act as influencing factors in their ability to show exclusion performance. Our study aims to test whether skuas are able to choose by exclusion in a visual two-way object-choice task. Twenty-six wild birds were presented with two opaque cups, one covering a food reward. Three conditions were used: 'full information' (showing the content of both cups), 'exclusion' (showing the content of the empty cup), and 'control' (not showing any content). Skuas preferentially selected the rewarded cup in the full information and exclusion condition. The use of olfactory cues was excluded by results in the control condition. Our study opens new field investigations for testing further the cognition of this predatory seabird.

Citing Articles

A cognitive approach to better understand foraging strategies of the adult domestic hen.

Degrande R, Cornilleau F, Jardat P, Ferreira V, Lansade L, Calandreau L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19265.

PMID: 39164385 PMC: 11336211. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70093-3.


Through an animal's eye: the implications of diverse sensory systems in scientific experimentation.

Brebner J, Loconsole M, Hanley D, Vasas V Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2027):20240022.

PMID: 39016597 PMC: 11253838. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0022.


Assessing sex differences in behavioural flexibility in an endangered bird species: the Southern ground-hornbill (Bucorvus leadbeateri).

Danel S, Rebout N, Kemp L Anim Cogn. 2022; 26(2):599-609.

PMID: 36251104 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01705-6.


Wild skuas can follow human-given behavioural cues when objects resemble natural food.

Danel S, Rebout N, Bonadonna F, Biro D Anim Cogn. 2022; 26(2):709-713.

PMID: 36153760 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01692-8.


Both sheep and goats can solve inferential by exclusion tasks.

Duffrene J, Petit O, Thierry B, Nowak R, Dufour V Anim Cogn. 2022; 25(6):1631-1644.

PMID: 35920940 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01656-y.


References
1.
Aust U, Range F, Steurer M, Huber L . Inferential reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans. Anim Cogn. 2008; 11(4):587-97. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-008-0149-0. View

2.
Byrne R, Bates L . Cognition in the wild: exploring animal minds with observational evidence. Biol Lett. 2011; 7(4):619-22. PMC: 3130250. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0352. View

3.
Call J . Inferences about the location of food in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol. 2004; 118(2):232-41. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.118.2.232. View

4.
Call J . Inferences by exclusion in the great apes: the effect of age and species. Anim Cogn. 2006; 9(4):393-403. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-006-0037-4. View

5.
de Kort S, Clayton N . An evolutionary perspective on caching by corvids. Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 273(1585):417-23. PMC: 1560201. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3350. View