» Articles » PMID: 33593453

Interventions to Improve Vitamin D Status in At-risk Ethnic Groups During Pregnancy and Early Childhood: a Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2021 Feb 17
PMID 33593453
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the literature with the primary aim of identifying behavioural interventions to improve vitamin D stores in children from at-risk ethnic groups.

Design: Review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017080932. Health Behaviour Model and Behaviour Change Wheel framework constructs used to underpin evaluation of interventions. Methodological quality evaluated using Cochrane Risk of Bias, Cochrane ROBINS-I and NHLBI tools.

Setting: Databases Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL with secondary search of Google Scholar. No country limits set. Papers between January 1990 and February 2018, published in English included. Anticipating study heterogeneity, outcome measures not pre-specified and identified from individual full papers. Updated literature search November 2020.

Participants: Patient or population including pregnant women, newborns and children aged under 18 years, from Asian or African ethnic groups.

Results: Of 10 690 articles screened, 298 underwent full-text review, with 24 ultimately included for data extraction. All identified studies conducted a vitamin D pharmacological supplementation intervention, with two also incorporating a behavioural intervention strategy. No study explicitly defined a primary aim of evaluating a behavioural intervention, undertaken to study its effect on vitamin D supplement uptake.

Conclusions: There is a need to address the paucity of data in ethnic at-risk children on how behavioural interventions ideally developed and co-produced with the community under study, affect and help improve vitamin D uptake, within the antenatal and pregnancy phase as well as during childhood.

Citing Articles

Association between vitamin D deficiency and major depression in patients with chronic kidney disease: a cohort study.

Chen I, Wang W, Lai Y, Chang Y, Lin Y, Hung K Front Nutr. 2025; 12:1540633.

PMID: 39931371 PMC: 11807813. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1540633.


Vitamin D Status among the Population Visiting Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Bhutan.

Dhakal G, Sharma K, Bajgai G, Sharma T, Bajgai T, Tenzin J Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2023; 27(5):436-439.

PMID: 38107740 PMC: 10723616. DOI: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_318_22.


Knowledge, attitudes, and practices associated with vitamin D supplementation: A cross-sectional online community survey of adults in the UK.

Tanna N, Karki M, Webber I, Alaa A, El-Costa A, Blair M PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0281172.

PMID: 37549145 PMC: 10406322. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281172.

References
1.
Hanson C, Armas L, Lyden E, Anderson-Berry A . Vitamin D status and associations in newborn formula-fed infants during initial hospitalization. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011; 111(12):1836-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.010. View

2.
Chhonkar A, Gupta A, Arya V . Comparison of Vitamin D Level of Children with Severe Early Childhood Caries and Children with No Caries. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018; 11(3):199-204. PMC: 6102444. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1511. View

3.
Blair M . Pregnant women need vitamin D for neonatal health. BMJ. 2017; 355:i6685. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i6685. View

4.
Sterne J, Savovic J, Page M, Elbers R, Blencowe N, Boutron I . RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019; 366:l4898. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4898. View

5.
Hossain N, Kanani F, Ramzan S, Kausar R, Ayaz S, Khanani R . Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of maternal vitamin D supplementation: results of an open-label, randomized controlled trial of antenatal vitamin D supplementation in Pakistani women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99(7):2448-55. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-3491. View