» Articles » PMID: 33590305

Hanging Protocol Optimization of Lumbar Spine Radiographs with Machine Learning

Overview
Journal Skeletal Radiol
Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology
Date 2021 Feb 16
PMID 33590305
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether machine learning algorithms can be utilized to optimize the hanging protocol of lumbar spine radiographs. Specifically, we explored whether machine learning models can accurately label lumbar spine views/positions, detect hardware, and rotate the lateral views to straighten the image.

Methods: We identified 1727 patients with 6988 lumbar spine radiographs. The view (anterior-posterior, right oblique, left oblique, left lateral, right lateral, left lumbosacral or right lumbosacral), hardware (present or not present), dynamic position (neutral, flexion, or extension), and correctional rotation of each radiograph were manually documented by a board-certified radiologist. Various output metrics were calculated, including area under the curve (AUC) for the categorical output models (view, hardware, and dynamic position). For non-binary categories, an all-versus-other technique was utilized designating one category as true and all others as false, allowing for a binary evaluation (e.g., AP vs. non-AP or extension vs. non-extension). For correctional rotation, the degree of rotation required to straighten the lateral spine radiograph was documented. The mean absolute difference was calculated between the ground truth and model-predicted value reported in degrees of rotation. Ensembles of the rotation models were created. We evaluated the rotation models on 3 test dataset splits: only 0 rotation, only non-0 rotation, and all cases.

Results: The AUC values for the categorical models ranged from 0.985 to 1.000. For the only 0 rotation data, the ensemble combining the absolute minimum value between the 20- and 60-degree models performed best (mean absolute difference of 0.610). For the non-0 rotation data, the ensemble merging the absolute maximum value between the 40- and 160-degree models performed best (mean absolute difference of 4.801). For the all cases split, the ensemble combining the minimum value of the 20- and 40-degree models performed best (mean absolute difference of 3.083).

Conclusion: Machine learning techniques can be successfully implemented to optimize lumbar spine x-ray hanging protocols by accounting for views, hardware, dynamic position, and rotation correction.

Citing Articles

Automated selection of abdominal MRI series using a DICOM metadata classifier and selective use of a pixel-based classifier.

Miller C, Zhu Z, Mazurowski M, Bashir M, Wiggins W Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(10):3735-3746.

PMID: 38860997 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04379-5.


AI applications in musculoskeletal imaging: a narrative review.

Gitto S, Serpi F, Albano D, Risoleo G, Fusco S, Messina C Eur Radiol Exp. 2024; 8(1):22.

PMID: 38355767 PMC: 10866817. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00422-8.


The promise and limitations of artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging.

Debs P, Fayad L Front Radiol. 2023; 3:1242902.

PMID: 37609456 PMC: 10440743. DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2023.1242902.


The use of deep learning in medical imaging to improve spine care: A scoping review of current literature and clinical applications.

Constant C, Aubin C, Kremers H, Garcia D, Wyles C, Rouzrokh P N Am Spine Soc J. 2023; 15:100236.

PMID: 37599816 PMC: 10432249. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100236.

References
1.
Kim J, Shim W, Yoon H, Hong S, Lee J, Cho Y . Computerized Bone Age Estimation Using Deep Learning Based Program: Evaluation of the Accuracy and Efficiency. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 209(6):1374-1380. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.17.18224. View

2.
Watanabe K, Aoki Y, Matsumoto M . An Application of Artificial Intelligence to Diagnostic Imaging of Spine Disease: Estimating Spinal Alignment From Moiré Images. Neurospine. 2020; 16(4):697-702. PMC: 6945007. DOI: 10.14245/ns.1938426.213. View

3.
Olczak J, Fahlberg N, Maki A, Sharif Razavian A, Jilert A, Stark A . Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs. Acta Orthop. 2017; 88(6):581-586. PMC: 5694800. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1344459. View

4.
Krogue J, Cheng K, Hwang K, Toogood P, Meinberg E, Geiger E . Automatic Hip Fracture Identification and Functional Subclassification with Deep Learning. Radiol Artif Intell. 2021; 2(2):e190023. PMC: 8017394. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020190023. View

5.
Kim K, Cho H, Jang T, Choi J, Seo J . Automatic detection and segmentation of lumbar vertebrae from X-ray images for compression fracture evaluation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020; 200:105833. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105833. View