Web of Lies: a Tool for Determining the Limits of Verification in Preventing the Spread of False Information on Networks

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2021 Feb 16

PMID 33589685

Authors

Kinga Makovi

Manuel Munoz-Herrera

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The spread of false information on social networks has garnered substantial scientific and popular attention. To counteract this spread, verification of the truthfulness of information has been proposed as a key intervention. Using a novel behavioral experiment with over 2000 participants, we analyze participants' willingness to spread false information in a network. All participants in the network have aligned incentives making lying attractive and countering the explicit norm of truth-telling that we impose. We investigate how verifying the truth, endogenously or exogenously, impacts the choice to lie or to adhere to the norm of truth-telling and how this compares to the spread of information in a setting in which such verification is not possible. The three key take-aways are (1) verification is only moderately effective in reducing the spread of lies, and (2) its effectivity is contingent on the agency of people in seeking the truth, and (3) on the exposure of liars, not only on the exposure of the lies being told. These results suggest that verification is not a blanket solution. To enhance its effectivity, verification should be combined with efforts to foster a culture of truth-seeking and with information on who is spreading lies.

References

Jun Y, Meng R, Johar G . Perceived social presence reduces fact-checking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(23):5976-5981. PMC: 5468680. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700175114. View

Weisel O, Shalvi S . The collaborative roots of corruption. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(34):10651-6. PMC: 4553769. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423035112. View

Sprouse J . A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory. Behav Res Methods. 2011; 43(1):155-67. PMC: 3048456. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-010-0039-7. View

Cowan S . Secrets and Misperceptions: The Creation of Self-Fulfilling Illusions. Sociol Sci. 2015; 1:466-492. PMC: 4465372. DOI: 10.15195/v1.a26. View

Nyhan B, Reifler J . Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information. Vaccine. 2014; 33(3):459-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.017. View

Scheufele D, Krause N . Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(16):7662-7669. PMC: 6475373. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115. View

Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling S . Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 6(1):3-5. DOI: 10.1177/1745691610393980. View

Boxell L, Gentzkow M, Shapiro J . Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(40):10612-10617. PMC: 5635884. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1706588114. View

Amir A, Kogut T, Bereby-Meyer Y . Careful Cheating: People Cheat Groups Rather than Individuals. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:371. PMC: 4811889. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00371. View

10.

Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S . The spread of true and false news online. Science. 2018; 359(6380):1146-1151. DOI: 10.1126/science.aap9559. View

11.

Lazer D, Baum M, Benkler Y, Berinsky A, Greenhill K, Menczer F . The science of fake news. Science. 2018; 359(6380):1094-1096. DOI: 10.1126/science.aao2998. View

12.

Becker J, Porter E, Centola D . The wisdom of partisan crowds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(22):10717-10722. PMC: 6561169. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1817195116. View

13.

Iyengar S, Massey D . Scientific communication in a post-truth society. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 116(16):7656-7661. PMC: 6475392. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805868115. View

14.

Schmitt H, Booy R, Weil-Olivier C, Van Damme P, Cohen R, Peltola H . Child vaccination policies in Europe: a report from the Summits of Independent European Vaccination Experts. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003; 3(2):103-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00519-x. View