» Articles » PMID: 33588878

Understanding the Implementation of Evidence-informed Policies and Practices from a Policy Perspective: a Critical Interpretive Synthesis

Overview
Journal Implement Sci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 Feb 16
PMID 33588878
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The fields of implementation science and knowledge translation have evolved somewhat independently from the field of policy implementation research, despite calls for better integration. As a result, implementation theory and empirical work do not often reflect the implementation experience from a policy lens nor benefit from the scholarship in all three fields. This means policymakers, researchers, and practitioners may find it challenging to draw from theory that adequately reflects their implementation efforts.

Methods: We developed an integrated theoretical framework of the implementation process from a policy perspective by combining findings from these fields using the critical interpretive synthesis method. We began with the compass question: How is policy currently described in implementation theory and processes and what aspects of policy are important for implementation success? We then searched 12 databases as well as gray literature and supplemented these documents with other sources to fill conceptual gaps. Using a grounded and interpretive approach to analysis, we built the framework constructs, drawing largely from the theoretical literature and then tested and refined the framework using empirical literature.

Results: A total of 11,434 documents were retrieved and assessed for eligibility and 35 additional documents were identified through other sources. Eighty-six unique documents were ultimately included in the analysis. Our findings indicate that policy is described as (1) the context, (2) a focusing lens, (3) the innovation itself, (4) a lever of influence, (5) an enabler/facilitator or barrier, or (6) an outcome. Policy actors were also identified as important participants or leaders of implementation. Our analysis led to the development of a two-part conceptual framework, including process and determinant components.

Conclusions: This framework begins to bridge the divide between disciplines and provides a new perspective about implementation processes at the systems level. It offers researchers, policymakers, and implementers a new way of thinking about implementation that better integrates policy considerations and can be used for planning or evaluating implementation efforts.

Citing Articles

Addressing health equity during design and implementation of health system reform initiatives: a scoping review and framework.

Bouckley T, Peiris D, Nambiar D, Mishra S, Sood T, Purwar P Int J Equity Health. 2025; 24(1):68.

PMID: 40069696 PMC: 11899096. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-025-02436-z.


"I would be very proud to be part of an initiative that didn't exclude people because it was hard": mapping and contextualising health equity responsibilities and decision-making tensions in the implementation of a multi-level system reform....

Bouckley T, Peiris D, Nambiar D, Prince S, Pearson S, Schierhout G Int J Equity Health. 2025; 24(1):54.

PMID: 40001131 PMC: 11863965. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-025-02405-6.


Editorial: Learning for action in policy implementation.

Su Y, Bullock H, Trisolini M, Emmons K Front Health Serv. 2024; 4:1515478.

PMID: 39628611 PMC: 11611835. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1515478.


Bills to Restrict Access to and Harm From Indoor Tanning Facilities in US State Legislatures, 1992‒2023.

Buller D, Berteletti J, Heckman C, Schroth K, Geller A, Stapleton J Am J Public Health. 2024; 115(2):191-200.

PMID: 39571132 PMC: 11715574. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307894.


Good quality end-of life care for people with an intellectual disability: A critical interpretive synthesis protocol.

Haigh M, McCarron M, McCallion P, Pavithra P, McMahon M PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0311577.

PMID: 39514541 PMC: 11548725. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311577.


References
1.
Jilcott S, Ammerman A, Sommers J, Glasgow R . Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 34(2):105-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF02872666. View

2.
Powell B, Proctor E, Glass J . A Systematic Review of Strategies for Implementing Empirically Supported Mental Health Interventions. Res Soc Work Pract. 2014; 24(2):192-212. PMC: 4002057. DOI: 10.1177/1049731513505778. View

3.
Gotham H, White M, Bergethon H, Feeney T, Cho D, Keehn B . An implementation story: moving the GAIN from pilot project to statewide use. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2008; 40(1):97-107. DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2008.10399765. View

4.
Yamey G . What are the barriers to scaling up health interventions in low and middle income countries? A qualitative study of academic leaders in implementation science. Global Health. 2012; 8:11. PMC: 3514334. DOI: 10.1186/1744-8603-8-11. View

5.
Evans B, Snooks H, Howson H, Davies M . How hard can it be to include research evidence and evaluation in local health policy implementation? Results from a mixed methods study. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:17. PMC: 3576241. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-17. View