A New Diagnostic Paradigm for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: Correlation of Impedance-pH Monitoring and Digital Reflux Scintigraphy Results

Overview

Journal Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

Specialty Otorhinolaryngology

Date 2021 Feb 14

PMID 33582850

Authors

Jin-Soo Park

Oleksandr Khoma

Leticia Burton

Hans Van der Wall

Gregory Leighton Falk

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: No gold-standard investigation exists for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH testing has uncertain utility in LPR. Meanwhile, reflux scintigraphy allows immediate and delayed visualisation of tracer reflux in the esophagus, pharynx, and lungs. The present study aimed to correlate MII-pH and scintigraphic reflux results in patients with primary LPR.

Methods: Consecutive patients with LPR underwent MII-pH and scintigraphic reflux studies. Abnormal values for MII-pH results were defined from existing literature. MII-pH and scintigraphic data were correlated.

Results: 105 patients with LPR [31 males (29.5%), median age 60 years (range 20-87)] were studied. Immediate scintigraphic reflux was seen in the pharynx in 94 (90.4%), and in the proximal esophagus in 94 (90.4%). Delayed scintigraphic contamination of the pharynx was seen in 101 patients (96.2%) and in the lungs of 56 patients (53.3%). For MII-pH, abnormally frequent reflux was seen in the distal esophagus in 12.4%, proximal esophagus in 25.7%, and in the pharynx in 82.9%. Patients with poor scintigraphic clearance had higher Demeester scores (p = 0.043), more proximal reflux episodes (p = 0.046), more distal acid reflux episodes (p = 0.023), and more prolonged bolus clearance times (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Reflux scintigraphy has a high yield in LPR patients. Scintigraphic time-activity curves correlated with validated MII-pH results. A high rate of pulmonary microaspiration was found in LPR patients. This study demonstrated a high level of pharyngeal contamination by scintigraphy and MII-pH, which supports the use of digital reflux scintigraphy in diagnosing LPR.

References

Koufman J . The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of.... Laryngoscope. 1991; 101(4 Pt 2 Suppl 53):1-78. DOI: 10.1002/lary.1991.101.s53.1. View

Khoma O, Falk S, Burton L, Van der Wall H, Falk G . Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux and Aspiration: Does Laparoscopic Fundoplication Significantly Decrease Pulmonary Aspiration?. Lung. 2018; 196(4):491-496. DOI: 10.1007/s00408-018-0128-4. View

Lechien J, Akst L, Hamdan A, Schindler A, Karkos P, Barillari M . Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 160(5):762-782. DOI: 10.1177/0194599819827488. View

Jaspersen D, Kulig M, Labenz J, Leodolter A, Lind T, Meyer-Sabellek W . Prevalence of extra-oesophageal manifestations in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an analysis based on the ProGERD Study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003; 17(12):1515-20. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01606.x. View

Vakil N, van Zanten S, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R . The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101(8):1900-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00630.x. View

Gyawali C, Kahrilas P, Savarino E, Zerbib F, Mion F, Smout A . Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut. 2018; 67(7):1351-1362. PMC: 6031267. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722. View

Dent J, Vakil N, Jones R, Bytzer P, Schoning U, Halling K . Accuracy of the diagnosis of GORD by questionnaire, physicians and a trial of proton pump inhibitor treatment: the Diamond Study. Gut. 2010; 59(6):714-21. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2009.200063. View

Harrell S, Koopman J, Woosley S, Wo J . Exclusion of pH artifacts is essential for hypopharyngeal pH monitoring. Laryngoscope. 2007; 117(3):470-4. DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31802d344c. View

Zerbib F, Roman S, Bruley des Varannes S, Gourcerol G, Coffin B, Ropert A . Normal values of pharyngeal and esophageal 24-hour pH impedance in individuals on and off therapy and interobserver reproducibility. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 11(4):366-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.041. View

10.

Falk G, Beattie J, Ing A, Falk S, Magee M, Burton L . Scintigraphy in laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a definitive diagnostic test?. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(12):3619-27. PMC: 4375586. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3619. View

11.

Falk M, Van der Wall H, Falk G . Differences between scintigraphic reflux studies in gastrointestinal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and correlation with symptoms. Nucl Med Commun. 2015; 36(6):625-30. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000289. View

12.

Burton L, Falk G, Beattie J, Novakovic D, Simpson S, Van der Wall H . Findings from a novel scintigraphic gastroesophageal reflux study in asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; 10(6):342-348. PMC: 7724283. View

13.

Vance D, Alnouri G, Shah P, OConnell Ferster A, Lyons K, Ross J . The Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Finding Score. J Voice. 2020; 37(1):92-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.11.008. View

14.

Hoppo T, Sanz A, Nason K, Carroll T, Rosen C, Normolle D . How much pharyngeal exposure is "normal"? Normative data for laryngopharyngeal reflux events using hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance (HMII). J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 16(1):16-24. PMC: 4091908. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1741-1. View

15.

Johnson L, DeMeester T . Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol. 1974; 62(4):325-32. View

16.

Burton L, Falk G, Baumgart K, Beattie J, Simpson S, Van der Wall H . Esophageal Clearance in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: Correlation of Reflux Scintigraphy and 24-hour Impedance/pH in a Cohort of Refractory Symptomatic Patients. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2020; 29(1):7-16. PMC: 7057724. DOI: 10.4274/mirt.galenos.2019.30085. View

17.

Koufman J, Amin M, Panetti M . Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 123(4):385-8. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2000.109935. View

18.

De Bortoli N, Nacci A, Savarino E, Martinucci I, Bellini M, Fattori B . How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related?. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(32):4363-70. PMC: 3436052. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363. View

19.

Lee B, Kim G, Ryu D, Kim D, Cheong J, Lee D . Combined Dual Channel Impedance/pH-metry in Patients With Suspected Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010; 16(2):157-65. PMC: 2879840. DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2010.16.2.157. View

20.

Vaezi M, Richter J, Stasney C, Spiegel J, Iannuzzi R, Crawley J . Treatment of chronic posterior laryngitis with esomeprazole. Laryngoscope. 2006; 116(2):254-60. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000192173.00498.ba. View