Topographical Mapping of the Mechanical Characteristics of the Human Neurocranium Considering the Role of Individual Layers

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2021 Feb 13

PMID 33580114

Citations 4

Authors

Johann Zwirner

Sarah Safavi

Mario Scholze

Kai Chun Li

John Neil Waddell

Bjorn Busse

Benjamin Ondruschka

Niels Hammer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The site-dependent load-deformation behavior of the human neurocranium and the load dissipation within the three-layered composite is not well understood. This study mechanically investigated 257 human frontal, temporal, parietal and occipital neurocranial bone samples at an age range of 2 to 94 years, using three-point bending tests. Samples were tested as full-thickness three-layered composites, as well as separated with both diploë attached and removed. Right temporal samples were the thinnest samples of all tested regions (median < 5 mm; p < 0.001) and withstood lowest failure loads (median < 762 N; p < 0.001). Outer tables were thicker and showed higher failure loads (median 2.4 mm; median 264 N) than inner tables (median 1.7 mm, p < 0.001; median 132 N, p = 0.003). The presence of diploë attached to outer and inner tables led to a significant reduction in bending strength (with diploë: median < 60 MPa; without diploë: median > 90 MPa, p < 0.001). Composites (r = 0.243, p = 0.011) and inner tables with attached diploë (r = 0.214, p = 0.032) revealed positive correlations between sample thickness and age. The three-layered composite is four times more load-resistant compared to the outer table and eight times more compared to the inner table.

Citing Articles

The emerging importance of skull-brain interactions in traumatic brain injury.

Goodman G, Devlin P, West B, Ritzel R Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1353513.

PMID: 38680490 PMC: 11047125. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1353513.

Cranial Bone Changes Induced by Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Neglected Player in Concussion Outcomes?.

Semple B, Panagiotopoulou O Neurotrauma Rep. 2023; 4(1):396-403.

PMID: 37350792 PMC: 10282977. DOI: 10.1089/neur.2023.0025.

Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.

Kroczek K, Turek P, Mazur D, Szczygielski J, Filip D, Brodowski R Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(8).

PMID: 35458276 PMC: 9027145. DOI: 10.3390/polym14081526.

The dynamic impact behavior of the human neurocranium.

Zwirner J, Ondruschka B, Scholze M, Workman J, Thambyah A, Hammer N Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):11331.

PMID: 34059728 PMC: 8167104. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90322-3.

References

Zhai X, Nauman E, Moryl D, Lycke R, Chen W . The effects of loading-direction and strain-rate on the mechanical behaviors of human frontal skull bone. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020; 103:103597. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103597. View

Delye H, Clijmans T, Mommaerts M, Sloten J, Goffin J . Creating a normative database of age-specific 3D geometrical data, bone density, and bone thickness of the developing skull: a pilot study. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015; 16(6):687-702. DOI: 10.3171/2015.4.PEDS1493. View

Alexander S, Rafaels K, Gunnarsson C, Weerasooriya T . Structural analysis of the frontal and parietal bones of the human skull. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018; 90:689-701. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.035. View

Coats B, Margulies S . Material properties of human infant skull and suture at high rates. J Neurotrauma. 2006; 23(8):1222-32. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1222. View

Hubbard R . Flexure of layered cranial bone. J Biomech. 1971; 4(4):251-63. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(71)90031-5. View

Torimitsu S, Nishida Y, Takano T, Koizumi Y, Hayakawa M, Yajima D . Effects of the freezing and thawing process on biomechanical properties of the human skull. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2013; 16(2):102-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2013.11.005. View

Lee J, Ondruschka B, Falland-Cheung L, Scholze M, Hammer N, Tong D . An Investigation on the Correlation between the Mechanical Properties of Human Skull Bone, Its Geometry, Microarchitectural Properties, and Water Content. J Healthc Eng. 2019; 2019:6515797. PMC: 6556309. DOI: 10.1155/2019/6515797. View

Schroder W, Harnisch B, Lippert H . [Biomechanics of calvaria. III. Resistance to tension of compact layers and diploe (author's transl)]. Unfallheilkunde. 1977; 80(8):335-9. View

Morgan E, Unnikrisnan G, Hussein A . Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2018; 20:119-143. PMC: 6053074. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121139. View

10.

Ruan J, Prasad P . The effects of skull thickness variations on human head dynamic impact responses. Stapp Car Crash J. 2007; 45:395-414. DOI: 10.4271/2001-22-0018. View

11.

Motherway J, Doorly M, Curtis M, Gilchrist M . Head impact biomechanics simulations: a forensic tool for reconstructing head injury?. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2009; 11 Suppl 1:S220-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.01.072. View

12.

Lynnerup N, Astrup J, Sejrsen B . Thickness of the human cranial diploe in relation to age, sex and general body build. Head Face Med. 2005; 1:13. PMC: 1351187. DOI: 10.1186/1746-160X-1-13. View

13.

Davis M, Loyd A, Shen H, Mulroy M, Nightingale R, Myers B . The mechanical and morphological properties of 6 year-old cranial bone. J Biomech. 2012; 45(15):2493-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.07.001. View

14.

Torimitsu S, Nishida Y, Takano T, Koizumi Y, Makino Y, Yajima D . Statistical analysis of biomechanical properties of the adult skull and age-related structural changes by sex in a Japanese forensic sample. Forensic Sci Int. 2013; 234:185.e1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.10.001. View

15.

Osterhoff G, Morgan E, Shefelbine S, Karim L, McNamara L, Augat P . Bone mechanical properties and changes with osteoporosis. Injury. 2016; 47 Suppl 2:S11-20. PMC: 4955555. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)47003-8. View

16.

EVANS F, LISSNER H . Tensile and compressive strength of human parietal bone. J Appl Physiol. 1957; 10(3):493-7. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1957.10.3.493. View

17.

Lynnerup N . Cranial thickness in relation to age, sex and general body build in a Danish forensic sample. Forensic Sci Int. 2001; 117(1-2):45-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00447-3. View

18.

Auperrin A, Delille R, Lesueur D, Bruyere K, Masson C, Drazetic P . Geometrical and material parameters to assess the macroscopic mechanical behaviour of fresh cranial bone samples. J Biomech. 2014; 47(5):1180-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.060. View

19.

Wood J . Dynamic response of human cranial bone. J Biomech. 1971; 4(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(71)90010-8. View

20.

Boruah S, Subit D, Paskoff G, Shender B, Crandall J, Salzar R . Influence of bone microstructure on the mechanical properties of skull cortical bone - A combined experimental and computational approach. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016; 65:688-704. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.09.041. View