» Articles » PMID: 33577594

Client-care Provider Interaction During Labour and Birth As Experienced by Women: Respect, Communication, Confidentiality and Autonomy

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Feb 12
PMID 33577594
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Respectful Maternity Care is important for achieving a positive labour and birth experience. Client-care provider interaction-specifically respect, communication, confidentiality and autonomy-is an important aspect of Respectful Maternity Care. The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to assess Dutch women's experience of respect, communication, confidentiality and autonomy during labour and birth and (2) to identify which client characteristics are associated with experiencing optimal respect, communication, confidentiality and autonomy.

Methods: Pregnant women and women who recently gave birth in the Netherlands were recruited to fill out a validated web-based questionnaire (ReproQ). Mean scores per domain (scale 1-4) were calculated. Domains were dichotomised in non-optimal (score 1, 2,3) and optimal client-care provider interaction (score 4), and a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed.

Results: Of the 1367 recruited women, 804 respondents completed the questionnaire and 767 respondents completed enough questions to be included for analysis. Each domain had a mean score above 3.5. The domain confidentiality had the highest proportion of optimal scores (64.0%), followed by respect (53.3%), communication (45.1%) and autonomy (36.2%). In all four domains, women who gave birth at home with a community midwife had a higher proportion of optimal scores than women who gave birth in the hospital with a (resident) obstetrician or hospital-based midwife. Lower education level, being multiparous and giving birth spontaneously were also significantly associated with a higher proportion of optimal scores in (one of) the domains.

Discussion: This study shows that on average women scored high on experienced client-care provider interaction in the domains respect, communication, confidentiality and autonomy. At the same time, client-care provider interaction in the Netherlands still fell short of being optimal for a large number of women, in particular regarding women's autonomy. These results show there is still room for improvement in client-care provider interaction during labour and birth.

Citing Articles

How power and knowledge hierarchies affect communication in intrapartum care: findings from public health facilities in two southern Indian districts.

Rao A, Srinidhi V, Karachiwala B, Santosh S, Seshadri S, Thomas S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):781.

PMID: 39587514 PMC: 11587590. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06973-3.


Improving birth experiences and provider interactions: Expert opinion on critical links in Maternity care.

Leinweber J, Stramrood C Eur J Midwifery. 2024; 8.

PMID: 39351401 PMC: 11440052. DOI: 10.18332/ejm/191742.


Perspective of obstetric care-providers on being involved in cervical cancer screening during antenatal care in the Netherlands.

van der Hoeven N, van den Brule A, van Beekhuizen H, de Kok I, van Kemenade F Cancer Med. 2024; 13(13):e7380.

PMID: 38967246 PMC: 11224965. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7380.


Shroud waving self-determination: A qualitative analysis of the moral and epistemic dimensions of obstetric violence in the Netherlands.

van der Waal R, van Nistelrooij I PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0297968.

PMID: 38648219 PMC: 11034656. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297968.


Evidence-based intrapartum care during vaginal births: Direct observations in a tertiary care hospital in Central Sri Lanka.

Weerasingha T, Ratnayake C, Abeyrathne R, Tennakoon S Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e28517.

PMID: 38571647 PMC: 10988013. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28517.


References
1.
Sadler M, Santos M, Ruiz-Berdun D, Rojas G, Skoko E, Gillen P . Moving beyond disrespect and abuse: addressing the structural dimensions of obstetric violence. Reprod Health Matters. 2016; 24(47):47-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.rhm.2016.04.002. View

2.
Handelzalts J, Waldman Peyser A, Krissi H, Levy S, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y . Indications for Emergency Intervention, Mode of Delivery, and the Childbirth Experience. PLoS One. 2017; 12(1):e0169132. PMC: 5207782. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169132. View

3.
Ravaldi C, Skoko E, Battisti A, Cericco M, Vannacci A . Abuse and disrespect in childbirth assistance in Italy: A community-based survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 224:208-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.055. View

4.
Neerland C, Avery M, Saftner M, Gurvich O . Maternal confidence for physiologic birth: Associated prenatal characteristics and outcomes. Midwifery. 2019; 77:110-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.07.004. View

5.
Seijmonsbergen-Schermers A, van den Akker T, Beeckman K, Bogaerts A, Barros M, Janssen P . Variations in childbirth interventions in high-income countries: protocol for a multinational cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(1):e017993. PMC: 5780680. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017993. View