» Articles » PMID: 33576551

Pre-school and School-aged Children Benefit from the Switch from a Sensor-augmented Pump to an AndroidAPS Hybrid Closed Loop: A Retrospective Analysis

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2021 Feb 12
PMID 33576551
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Data on closed loop systems in young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are limited. We tested the efficacy and safety of an open-source, do-it-yourself automated insulin delivery system AndroidAPS in preschool and school-aged children.

Research Design And Methods: This retrospective study analyzed diabetes control in 18 preschool (3-7 years) and 18 school-aged children (8-14 years) with T1D who switched from a sensor-augmented pump (SAP) to AndroidAPS. We compared the CGM parameters and HbA1c levels 3 months before and 6 months after the initiation of AndroidAPS therapy and evaluated frequency of severe adverse events during AndroidAPS use, the most frequent reasons for its interruption, and the experience and psychosocial benefits of AndroidAPS use.

Results: General glycemic control was significantly improved after the switch from SAP to AndroidAPS. Time in range (TIR) increased in both preschool (70.8%-78.6%, p = 0.004) and school-aged children (77.2%-82.9%, p < 0.001), whereas HbA1c levels decreased (preschool children 53.8-48.5 mmol/mol, p < 0.001; school-aged children 52.6-45.1 mmol/mol, p = 0.001). Time spent in range of 3.0-3.8 mmol/L increased slightly in school children (2.6%-3.8%, p = 0.040), but not in preschool children (3.0%-3.0%, p = 0.913). Time spent at <3 mmol/L remained unchanged in both preschool (0.95%-0.67%, p = 0.432) and school-aged children (0.8%-0.8%, p = 1.000). No episodes of severe hypoglycemia or DKA and significant improvement of quality of life were reported by AndroidAPS users.

Conclusions: AndroidAPS seems effective for T1D control both in preschool and school-age children but further validation by prospective studies is necessary.

Citing Articles

Examining the Emotional and Physical Health Impact in Users of Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery and Sources of Support: Qualitative Analysis of Patient Narratives.

Cleal B, Chen Y, Waldchen M, Ballhausen H, Cooper D, ODonnell S J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27():e48406.

PMID: 39761553 PMC: 11747533. DOI: 10.2196/48406.


Retrospective Comparison of Commercially Available Automated Insulin Delivery With Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Type 1 Diabetes.

Schutz A, Rami-Merhar B, Schutz-Fuhrmann I, Blauensteiner N, Baumann P, Pottler T J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; :19322968241230106.

PMID: 38366626 PMC: 11571566. DOI: 10.1177/19322968241230106.


A comparison of the usage of an open-source automated insulin delivery system and the MiniMed™ 780 G system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in real-world settings: the AWeSoMe study group.

Landau Z, Lebenthal Y, Mazor-Aronovitch K, Brener A, Levek N, Jacobi-Polishook T Endocrine. 2024; 84(3):943-950.

PMID: 38225516 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-024-03683-w.


Are all HCL systems the same? long term outcomes of three HCL systems in children with type 1 diabetes: real-life registry-based study.

Santova A, Plachy L, Neuman V, Pavlikova M, Petruzelkova L, Konecna P Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1283181.

PMID: 37908748 PMC: 10613700. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1283181.


Measures of Patient-Reported Expectations, Acceptance, and Satisfaction Using Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: A Review.

Marigliano M, Mozzillo E, Mancioppi V, Candia F, Rosanio F, Antonelli A J Pers Med. 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37511644 PMC: 10382040. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071031.