» Articles » PMID: 33574369

Peaks in Bat Activity at Turbines and the Implications for Mitigating the Impact of Wind Energy Developments on Bats

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Feb 12
PMID 33574369
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Wind turbines are a relatively new threat to bats, causing mortalities worldwide. Reducing these fatalities is essential to ensure that the global increase in wind-energy facilities can occur with minimal impact on bat populations. Although individual bats have been observed approaching wind turbines, and fatalities frequently reported, it is unclear whether bats are actively attracted to, indifferent to, or repelled by, the turbines at large wind-energy installations. In this study, we assessed bat activity at paired turbine and control locations at 23 British wind farms. The research focussed on Pipistrellus species, which were by far the most abundant bats recorded at these sites. P. pipistrellus activity was 37% higher at turbines than at control locations, whereas P. pygmaeus activity was consistent with no attraction or repulsion by turbines. Given that more than 50% of bat fatalities in Europe are P. pipistrellus, these findings help explain why Environmental Impact Assessments conducted before the installation of turbines are poor predictors of actual fatality rates. They also suggest that operational mitigation (minimising blade rotation in periods of high collision risk) is likely to be the most effective way to reduce collisions because the presence of turbines alters bat activity.

Citing Articles

Advancing bat monitoring: Assessing the impact of unmanned aerial systems on bat activity.

Roswag M, Roswag A, Roswag M, Fietz J, Taefi T PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0314679.

PMID: 39841701 PMC: 11753712. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314679.


Distribution of common pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) activity is altered by airflow disruption generated by wind turbines.

Leroux C, Barre K, Valet N, Kerbiriou C, Le Viol I PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303368.

PMID: 38820349 PMC: 11142562. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303368.


Toward solving the global green-green dilemma between wind energy production and bat conservation.

Voigt C, Bernard E, Huang J, Frick W, Kerbiriou C, MacEwan K Bioscience. 2024; 74(4):240-252.

PMID: 38720909 PMC: 11075649. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biae023.


Experimental trials of species-specific bat flight responses to an ultrasonic deterrent.

Fritts S, Guest E, Weaver S, Hale A, Morton B, Hein C PeerJ. 2024; 12:e16718.

PMID: 38188150 PMC: 10771094. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16718.


NEAL: an open-source tool for audio annotation.

Gibbons A, Donohue I, Gorman C, King E, Parnell A PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15913.

PMID: 37645015 PMC: 10461540. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15913.


References
1.
Roeleke M, Blohm T, Kramer-Schadt S, Yovel Y, Voigt C . Habitat use of bats in relation to wind turbines revealed by GPS tracking. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:28961. PMC: 4931514. DOI: 10.1038/srep28961. View

2.
Lintott P, Richardson S, Hosken D, Fensome S, Mathews F . Ecological impact assessments fail to reduce risk of bat casualties at wind farms. Curr Biol. 2016; 26(21):R1135-R1136. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.003. View

3.
Lintott P, Davison S, van Breda J, Kubasiewicz L, Dowse D, Daisley J . Ecobat: An online resource to facilitate transparent, evidence-based interpretation of bat activity data. Ecol Evol. 2018; 8(2):935-941. PMC: 5773315. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3692. View

4.
Onakpoya I, OSullivan J, Thompson M, Heneghan C . The effect of wind turbine noise on sleep and quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Environ Int. 2015; 82:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.04.014. View

5.
Minderman J, Pendlebury C, Pearce-Higgins J, Park K . Experimental evidence for the effect of small wind turbine proximity and operation on bird and bat activity. PLoS One. 2012; 7(7):e41177. PMC: 3408485. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041177. View