» Articles » PMID: 33573217

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of an Observational Measure for Parent-Child Responsive Caregiving

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Feb 12
PMID 33573217
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Responsive caregiving is the dimension of parenting most consistently related to later child functioning in both developing and developed countries. There is a growing need for efficient, psychometrically sound and culturally appropriate measurement of this construct. This study describes the cross-cultural validation in Brazil of the Responsive Interactions for Learning (RIFL-P) measure, requiring only eight minutes for assessment and coding. The cross-cultural adaptation used a recognized seven-step procedure. The adapted version was applied to a stratified sample of 153 Brazilian mother-child (18 months) dyads. Videos of mother-child interaction were coded using the RIFL-P and a longer gold standard parenting assessment. Mothers completed a survey on child stimulation (18 months) and child outcomes were measured at 24 months. Internal consistency (α = 0.94), inter-rater reliability ( = 0.83), and intra-rater reliability ( = 0.94) were all satisfactory to high. RIFL-P scores were significantly correlated with another measurement of parenting ('s ranged from 0.32 to 0.47, < 0.001), stimulation markers ( = 0.34, < 0.01), and children's cognition ( = 0.29, < 0.001), language ( = 0.28, < 0.001), and positive behavior ( = 0.17, < 0.05). The Brazilian Portuguese version is a valid and reliable instrument for a brief assessment of responsive caregiving.

Citing Articles

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the universal Welch Emotional Connection Screen using primary and bilingual Spanish-speaking coders of videotaped mother-child interactions.

Hane A, Ludwig R, Martinez A, Masese C, Vanhatalo U, Goddard C Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025; 3():1346121.

PMID: 39816595 PMC: 11732013. DOI: 10.3389/frcha.2024.1346121.


Towards a better understanding of real-world home-visiting programs: a large-scale effectiveness study of parenting mechanisms in Brazil.

Healy M, Viegas da Silva E, Lundborg A, Hartwig F, Munhoz T, Arteche A BMJ Glob Health. 2024; 9(2).

PMID: 38382980 PMC: 10882332. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013787.


Intimate partner violence victimisation and its association with maternal parenting (the 2015 Pelotas [Brazil] Birth Cohort): a prospective cohort study.

Coll C, Barros A, Stein A, Devries K, Buffarini R, Murray L Lancet Glob Health. 2023; 11(9):e1393-e1401.

PMID: 37591586 PMC: 10447221. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00282-6.


Introduction to the Special Issue on Early Child Development: From Measurement to Optimal Functioning and Evidence-Based Policy.

Schiariti V Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(10).

PMID: 34067979 PMC: 8152269. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105154.

References
1.
Alvarenga P, Cerezo M, Wiese E, Piccinini C . Effects of a short video feedback intervention on enhancing maternal sensitivity and infant development in low-income families. Attach Hum Dev. 2019; 22(5):534-554. DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2019.1602660. View

2.
Evans G, Kim P . Childhood poverty and young adults' allostatic load: the mediating role of childhood cumulative risk exposure. Psychol Sci. 2012; 23(9):979-83. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612441218. View

3.
Bornstein M, Putnick D, Lansford J, Deater-Deckard K, Bradley R . A Developmental Analysis of Caregiving Modalities Across Infancy in 38 Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Child Dev. 2015; 86(5):1571-87. PMC: 4617545. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12402. View

4.
Yousafzai A, Obradovic J, Rasheed M, Rizvi A, Portilla X, Tirado-Strayer N . Effects of responsive stimulation and nutrition interventions on children's development and growth at age 4 years in a disadvantaged population in Pakistan: a longitudinal follow-up of a cluster-randomised factorial effectiveness trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2016; 4(8):e548-58. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30100-0. View

5.
Epstein J, Santo R, Guillemin F . A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68(4):435-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021. View