» Articles » PMID: 33572611

Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Feb 12
PMID 33572611
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dentinal tubule penetration influences root canal treatment sealing. The aim of this study was to compare dentinal penetration of two clinical presentations of silicate-based sealers using confocal laser. Sixty single-rooted human teeth from 50-70 year-old patients extracted for orthodontic/periodontal reasons were used. Canals were prepared using Mtwo system up to 35/0.04, with 5.25% NaOCl irrigation and final irrigation using 17% EDTA. Teeth were randomly assigned into study groups (n = 20): EndoSequence BC sealer (ES, group 1), BioRoot RCS (BR, group 2); and a control group (n = 20) with AH Plus (AHP). Root canals were obturated with 35/0.04 gutta-percha (single-cone technique). The samples were obtained from apical, middle, and coronal thirds. Dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage of penetration around the canal perimeter were measured. The statistical analysis was performed using Mann Whitney U test and Wilcoxon -test (95% confidence interval). ES exhibited a significantly higher penetration than AHP in apical and middle thirds ( < 0.05), and in middle and coronal thirds relative to BR ( < 0.05). The percentage of penetration around the canal perimeter was significantly higher for ES compared to BR in all thirds, but only in the apical third for AHP ( < 0.05). The pre-mixed silicate-based sealer exhibited better penetration than the powder/liquid one.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Different Obturation Techniques in the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of EndoSequence® Bioceramic Sealer HiFlow™: An In-Vitro Study.

Mobayed M, Ayoubi H, Achour H, Alsayed Tolibah Y Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71155.

PMID: 39525185 PMC: 11548115. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71155.


Influence of bioceramic sealers on dentinal tubule penetration and antimicrobial effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

Seron M, Nunes G, Ferrisse T, Strazzi-Sahyon H, Dos Santos P, Gomes-Filho J Odontology. 2024; 112(3):672-699.

PMID: 38374511 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-024-00904-6.


Investigation on the physical properties and biocompatibility of zirconia-alumina-silicate@diopside composite materials and its toxicity study in embryonic zebrafish.

Rittidach T, Sillapaprayoon S, Chantho V, Pimtong W, Charoenphandhu N, Thongbunchoo J RSC Adv. 2023; 13(44):30575-30585.

PMID: 37859778 PMC: 10583262. DOI: 10.1039/d3ra04555b.


Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Dentinal Tubule Penetration-A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.

Ashkar I, Sanz J, Forner L, Melo M Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(7).

PMID: 37049028 PMC: 10096084. DOI: 10.3390/ma16072734.


Dentin Sealing of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers in Root Canal Retreatment: A Confocal Laser Microscopy Study.

Ortiz-Blanco B, Sanz J, Llena C, Lozano A, Forner L J Funct Biomater. 2022; 13(3).

PMID: 35997452 PMC: 9397037. DOI: 10.3390/jfb13030114.


References
1.
Santos J, Coelho C, Sequeira D, Marques J, Pereira J, Sousa V . Subcutaneous Implantation Assessment of New Calcium-Silicate Based Sealer for Warm Obturation. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(1). PMC: 7824331. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9010024. View

2.
Huang T, Yang J, Li H, Kao C . The biocompatibility evaluation of epoxy resin-based root canal sealers in vitro. Biomaterials. 2002; 23(1):77-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00081-3. View

3.
Schneider S . A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32(2):271-5. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1. View

4.
Vieira Silva R, Silveira F, Horta M, Duarte M, Cavenago B, Morais I . Filling Effectiveness and Dentinal Penetration of Endodontic Sealers: A Stereo and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study. Braz Dent J. 2015; 26(5):541-6. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201300138. View

5.
Benezra M, Schembri Wismayer P, Camilleri J . Interfacial Characteristics and Cytocompatibility of Hydraulic Sealer Cements. J Endod. 2018; 44(6):1007-1017. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.011. View