» Articles » PMID: 33569072

Species-Specific Responses of Root Morphology of Three Co-existing Tree Species to Nutrient Patches Reflect Their Root Foraging Strategies

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2021 Feb 11
PMID 33569072
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Root foraging strategies of plants may be critical to the competition for nutrient resources in the nutrient patches, but little is known about these of co-existing tree species in subtropical regions. This study aimed to elucidate root foraging strategies of three co-existing tree species in nutrient heterogeneous soils by exploring their root distribution, root morphology, photosynthates allocation and nutrient accumulation. Seedlings of the three tree species [moso bamboo (), Chinese fir (), and masson pine ()] were grown for 8months under one homogeneous soil [uniform nitrogen (N) plus phosphorus (P)] and three heterogeneous soils (localized N supply, localized P supply, or localized N plus P supply). The biomass, root morphological parameters (i.e., root length and root surface area), specific root length (SRL), non-structural carbohydrates (NSCs, i.e., mobile sugar and starch) in roots, total N and total P of plants were measured. The plasticity and distribution of root system were analyzed by calculating the root response ratio (RRR) and root foraging precision (FP), respectively. The results are as follows (i) Chinese fir tended to forage more N by promoting root proliferation in the N-rich patch, while root proliferation of bamboo and pine did not change. For P, bamboo absorbed more P by promoting root proliferation in the P-rich patch. The total P content of Pine and Chinese fir under localized P supply treatment remain the same despite the fact that the root length in the P-rich patch and the FP increased. (ii) Chinese fir foraged more N by increasing root length and decreasing SRL in the NP-rich patch; bamboo foraged more N and P by increasing root length and SRL in the NP-rich patch. The FP and foraging scale (FS) of both bamboo and Chinese fir were significantly improved under localized N plus P treatment. (iii) The concentrations of NSC were positively correlated with root morphological plasticity for moso bamboo and Chinese fir. Our results indicated that higher morphological plasticity is exhibited in moso bamboo and Chinese fir than masson pine in nutrient heterogeneous soils, allowing them to successfully forage for more nutrients.

Citing Articles

Fish protein fertilizer serves as a sustainable alternative, improving soil properties, bamboo growth and shoots yield in Lei bamboo forests.

Zhao J, Ni H, Wang B, Yang Z Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4363.

PMID: 39910135 PMC: 11799177. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88503-5.


Young temperate tree species show different fine root acclimation capacity to growing season water availability.

Jaeger F, Handa I, Paquette A, Parker W, Messier C Plant Soil. 2024; 496(1-2):485-504.

PMID: 38510944 PMC: 10948563. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-023-06377-w.


Early lateral root formation in response to calcium and nickel shows variation within disjunct populations of spp. .

Veatch-Blohm M, Medina G, Butler J Heliyon. 2023; 9(2):e13632.

PMID: 36846704 PMC: 9950942. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13632.


Response strategies of fine root morphology of to the different soil environment.

Wen X, Wang X, Ye M, Liu H, He W, Wang Y Front Plant Sci. 2023; 13:1077090.

PMID: 36618632 PMC: 9811150. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1077090.


Genetic variation in morphological traits in cotton and their roles in increasing phosphorus-use-efficiency in response to low phosphorus availability.

Kayoumu M, Li X, Iqbal A, Wang X, Gui H, Qi Q Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:1051080.

PMID: 36531355 PMC: 9749730. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1051080.


References
1.
Poorter H, Ryser P . The limits to leaf and root plasticity: what is so special about specific root length?. New Phytol. 2015; 206(4):1188-90. DOI: 10.1111/nph.13438. View

2.
Shen J, Yuan L, Zhang J, Li H, Bai Z, Chen X . Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiol. 2011; 156(3):997-1005. PMC: 3135930. DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.175232. View

3.
Giehl R, von Wiren N . Root nutrient foraging. Plant Physiol. 2014; 166(2):509-17. PMC: 4213083. DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.245225. View

4.
Joshi M, Fogelman E, Belausov E, Ginzberg I . Potato root system development and factors that determine its architecture. J Plant Physiol. 2016; 205:113-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.08.014. View

5.
Garcia-Palacios P, Maestre F, Bardgett R, de Kroon H . Plant responses to soil heterogeneity and global environmental change. J Ecol. 2015; 100(6):1303-1314. PMC: 4407979. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.02014.x. View