» Articles » PMID: 33569062

The Immunobiogram, a Novel Assay to Evaluate Treatment Resistance in Patients Receiving Immunosuppressive Therapy

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2021 Feb 11
PMID 33569062
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Immunosuppressive drugs are widely used to treat several autoimmune disorders and prevent rejection after organ transplantation. However, intra-individual variations in the pharmacological response to immunosuppressive therapy critically influence its efficacy, often resulting in poor treatment responses and serious side effects. Effective diagnostic tools that help clinicians to tailor immunosuppressive therapy to the needs and immunological profile of the individual patient thus constitute a major unmet clinical need. assays that measure immune cell responses to immunosuppressive drugs constitute a promising approach to individualized immunosuppressive therapy. Here, we present the Immunobiogram, a functional pharmacodynamic immune cell-based assay for simultaneous quantitative measurement of a patient's immune response to a battery of immunosuppressive drugs. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from patients are immunologically stimulated to induce activation and proliferation and embedded in a hydrogel mixture in which they are exposed to a concentration gradient of the immunosuppressants of interest. Analysis of samples from kidney transplant patients using this procedure revealed an association between the sensitivity of individual patients to the immunosuppressive regimen and their immunological risk of transplant rejection. Incorporation of the Immunobiogram assay into clinical settings could greatly facilitate personalized optimization and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapy, and study of the mechanisms underlying resistance to immunosuppressants.

Citing Articles

Immunoprotection of cellular transplants for autoimmune type 1 diabetes through local drug delivery.

Lansberry T, Stabler C Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2024; 206:115179.

PMID: 38286164 PMC: 11140763. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2024.115179.


The IMBG Test for Evaluating the Pharmacodynamic Response to Immunosuppressive Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients: Current Evidence and Future Applications.

Pascual J, Crespo M, Portoles J, Jimenez C, Ortega-Carrion A, Diez T Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(6).

PMID: 36982276 PMC: 10049381. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065201.

References
1.
Tonelli M, Wiebe N, Knoll G, Bello A, Browne S, Jadhav D . Systematic review: kidney transplantation compared with dialysis in clinically relevant outcomes. Am J Transplant. 2011; 11(10):2093-109. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03686.x. View

2.
Nam K, Watanabe J, Ishihara K . Modeling of swelling and drug release behavior of spontaneously forming hydrogels composed of phospholipid polymers. Int J Pharm. 2004; 275(1-2):259-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.02.009. View

3.
Kihara Y, Matsuno N, Mijiti A, Nagao T, Takeuchi H, Unezaki S . Comparative study of the cellular pharmacodynamics of calcineurin inhibitors between patients with chronic renal failure awaiting renal transplantation and cirrhosis patients awaiting liver transplantation. Cell Transplant. 2009; 18(5):639-46. DOI: 10.1177/096368970901805-620. View

4.
Baker B, Chen C . Deconstructing the third dimension: how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. J Cell Sci. 2012; 125(Pt 13):3015-24. PMC: 3434846. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.079509. View

5.
Zaza G, Leventhal J, Signorini L, Gambaro G, Cravedi P . Effects of Antirejection Drugs on Innate Immune Cells After Kidney Transplantation. Front Immunol. 2020; 10:2978. PMC: 6930910. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02978. View