» Articles » PMID: 33568204

Pneumonia Scoring Systems for Severe COVID-19: Which One is Better

Overview
Journal Virol J
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2021 Feb 11
PMID 33568204
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the predictive significance of different pneumonia scoring systems in clinical severity and mortality risk of patients with severe novel coronavirus pneumonia.

Materials And Methods: A total of 53 cases of severe novel coronavirus pneumonia were confirmed. The APACHE II, MuLBSTA and CURB-65 scores of different treatment methods were calculated, and the predictive power of each score on clinical respiratory support treatment and mortality risk was compared.

Results: The APACHE II score showed the largest area under ROC curve in both noninvasive and invasive respiratory support treatment assessments, which is significantly different from that of CURB-65. Further, the MuLBSTA score had the largest area under ROC curve in terms of death risk assessment, which is also significantly different from that of CURB-65; however, no difference was noted with the APACHE II score.

Conclusion: For patients with COVID, the APACHE II score is an effective predictor of the disease severity and mortality risk. Further, the MuLBSTA score is a good predictor only in terms of mortality risk.

Citing Articles

Association of Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) Levels and Disease Severity in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19.

Evlice O, Bektas M, Kar F, Marim F, Kaya I, Yorukoglu K Infect Dis Clin Microbiol. 2024; 5(4):292-299.

PMID: 38633849 PMC: 10986708. DOI: 10.36519/idcm.2023.260.


Evaluating the factors affecting clinical outcomes in critically ill COVID-19 unvaccinated patients admitted to the intensive care unit in a lower-middle-income country.

Heydari F, Karimpour-Razkenari E, Azadtarigheh P, Vahdatinia A, Salahshoor A, Alipour A Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(1):42-49.

PMID: 38222708 PMC: 10783397. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001379.


Analysis of mitochondrial function in lymphocytes obtained from COVID-19 patients.

He Z, Liu J, Ma S Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2023; 37:3946320231210736.

PMID: 37889851 PMC: 10612433. DOI: 10.1177/03946320231210736.


Clinical and Laboratory Predictors of Mortality in Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Retrospective Study from India.

Karanth Marsur Prabhakar S, Ramaswamy S, Basavarajachar V, Chakraborty A, Shivananjiah A, Chikkavenkatappa N Thorac Res Pract. 2023; 24(2):53-60.

PMID: 37503640 PMC: 10332473. DOI: 10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.22029.


Evaluation of risk scores as predictors of mortality and hospital length of stay for older COVID-19 patients.

Buyukaydin B, Karaaslan T, Uysal O Aging Med (Milton). 2023; 6(1):56-62.

PMID: 36911090 PMC: 10000259. DOI: 10.1002/agm2.12238.


References
1.
Kalil A, Thomas P . Influenza virus-related critical illness: pathophysiology and epidemiology. Crit Care. 2019; 23(1):258. PMC: 6642581. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2539-x. View

2.
Wang Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Qin Q . Unique epidemiological and clinical features of the emerging 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) implicate special control measures. J Med Virol. 2020; 92(6):568-576. PMC: 7228347. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25748. View

3.
Mizumoto K, Chowell G . Estimating Risk for Death from Coronavirus Disease, China, January-February 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020; 26(6):1251-1256. PMC: 7258458. DOI: 10.3201/eid2606.200233. View

4.
Zhou X, Ben S, Chen H, Ni S . A comparison of APACHE II and CPIS scores for the prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Int J Infect Dis. 2014; 30:144-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.11.005. View

5.
Guan W, Ni Z, Hu Y, Liang W, Ou C, He J . Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(18):1708-1720. PMC: 7092819. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. View