» Articles » PMID: 33559808

Better Pain Control with 8-gray Single Fraction Palliative Radiotherapy for Skeletal Metastases: a Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Feb 9
PMID 33559808
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) allows remarkable pain control in patients with skeletal metastases. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing the most commonly used radiotherapy regimens for palliative management in patients with skeletal metastases. The main online databases were accessed in October 2020. All randomized clinical trials evaluating the irradiation of painful bone metastases were considered. The following irradiation patterns were analysed and included in the present network meta-analysis: 8 Gy- and 10 Gy/single fraction, 20 Gy/5 fractions, 30 Gy/10 fractions. The Bayesian hierarchical random-effect model analysis was adopted in all comparisons. The Log Odds-Ratio (LOR) statistical method for dichotomic data was adopted for analysis. Data from 3595 patients were analysed. The mean follow-up was 9.5 (1 to 28) months. The cumulative mean age was 63.3 ± 2.9. 40.61% (1461 of 3595 patients) were female. The 8Gy/single fraction protocol detected reduced rate of "no pain response" (LOR 3.39), greater rate of "pain response" (LOR-5.88) and complete pain remission (LOR-7.05) compared to the other dose patterns. The 8Gy group detected a lower rate of pathological fractures (LOR 1.16), spinal cord compression (LOR 1.31) and re-irradiation (LOR 2.97) compared to the other dose patterns. Palliative 8Gy/single fraction radiotherapy for skeletal metastases shows outstanding results in terms of pain control, re-irradiations, pathological fractures and spinal cord compression, with no differences in terms of survivorship compared to the other multiple dose patterns.Level of evidence: I, Bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs.

Citing Articles

Clinical efficacy analysis of surgical treatment for spinal metastasis under the multidisciplinary team using the NOMS decision system combined with the revised Tokuhashi scoring system: a randomized controlled study.

Xiang X, Gao K, Zhang W, Li C, Feng K, Cao G J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):195.

PMID: 38515197 PMC: 10956187. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04668-1.


Comparison of pain-relieving effects by number of irradiations, through propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint.

Aoki Y, Nakayama M, Nakajima K, Yamashina M, Okizaki A Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023; 28(4):506-513.

PMID: 37795227 PMC: 10547426. DOI: 10.5603/RPOR.a2023.0054.


Surgical outcomes and risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with cervical spine metastasis: a prospective study.

Kanda Y, Kakutani K, Sakai Y, Zhang Z, Yurube T, Miyazaki S J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1):423.

PMID: 34217343 PMC: 8254288. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02562-8.

References
1.
Fairchild A, Barnes E, Ghosh S, Ben-Josef E, Roos D, Hartsell W . International patterns of practice in palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases: evidence-based practice?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 75(5):1501-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.084. View

2.
Koswig S, Budach V . [Remineralization and pain relief in bone metastases after after different radiotherapy fractions (10 times 3 Gy vs. 1 time 8 Gy). A prospective study]. Strahlenther Onkol. 1999; 175(10):500-8. DOI: 10.1007/s000660050061. View

3.
Lutz S, Berk L, Chang E, Chow E, Hahn C, Hoskin P . Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 79(4):965-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.026. View

4.
Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Trivellas A, Eschweiler J, Tingart M, Driessen A . Bone metastases: a comprehensive review of the literature. Mol Biol Rep. 2020; 47(8):6337-6345. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-020-05684-0. View

5.
Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell D, Chaimani A, Schmid C, Cameron C . The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162(11):777-84. DOI: 10.7326/M14-2385. View