» Articles » PMID: 33558044

Patient Factors That Matter in Predicting Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Machine-Learning Approach

Overview
Journal J Arthroplasty
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Feb 9
PMID 33558044
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA), approximately 10%-15% of patients will be dissatisfied with their outcome. Identifying patients at risk of not achieving meaningful gains postoperatively is critical to pre-surgical counseling and clinical decision support. Machine learning has shown promise in creating predictive models. This study used a machine-learning model to identify patient-specific variables that predict the postoperative functional outcome in THA.

Methods: A prospective longitudinal cohort of 160 consecutive patients undergoing total hip replacement for the treatment of degenerative arthritis completed self-reported measures preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. Using four types of independent variables (patient demographics, patient-reported health, cognitive appraisal processes and surgical approach), a machine-learning model utilizing Least Absolute Shrinkage Selection Operator (LASSO) was constructed to predict postoperative Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at 3 months.

Results: The most predictive independent variables of postoperative HOOS were cognitive appraisal processes. Variables that predicted a worse HOOS consisted of frequent thoughts of work (β = -0.34), frequent comparison to healthier peers (β = -0.26), increased body mass index (β = -0.17), increased medical comorbidities (β = -0.19), and the anterior surgical approach (β = -0.15). Variables that predicted a better HOOS consisted of employment at the time of surgery (β = 0.17), and thoughts related to family interaction (β = 0.12), trying not to complain (β = 0.13), and helping others (β = 0.22).

Conclusions: This clinical prediction model in THA revealed that the factors most predictive of outcome were cognitive appraisal processes, demonstrating their importance to outcome-based research.

Level Of Evidence: Prognostic Level 1.

Citing Articles

Clinical frailty scale predicts outcomes following total joint arthroplasty.

Wall B, Wittauer M, Dillon K, Seymour H, Yates P, Jones C Arthroplasty. 2025; 7(1):13.

PMID: 40025603 PMC: 11874104. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-024-00294-8.


Machine learning models predicting risk of revision or secondary knee injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction demonstrate variable discriminatory and accuracy performance: a systematic review.

Blackman B, Vivekanantha P, Mughal R, Pareek A, Bozzo A, Samuelsson K BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):16.

PMID: 39755642 PMC: 11699785. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08228-w.


Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor.

Balch J, Chatham A, Hong P, Manganiello L, Baskaran N, Bihorac A Front Artif Intell. 2024; 7:1477447.

PMID: 39564457 PMC: 11573790. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2024.1477447.


Associations of cognitive appraisal and patient activation on disability and mental health outcomes: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing spine surgery.

Skolasky R, Finkelstein J, Schwartz C BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):595.

PMID: 39069610 PMC: 11285205. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07709-2.


Patient-Reported Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty at an Ambulatory Surgery Center Versus a Hospital-Based Center.

Davey A, Connors J, Hewitt C, Grosso M J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024; 8(6).

PMID: 38866724 PMC: 11175860. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00124.