Intraoperative Image Guidance for Cervical Spine Surgery

Overview

Journal Ann Transl Med

Publisher AME Publishing Company

Date 2021 Feb 8

PMID 33553386

Citations 6

Authors

Sertac Kirnaz

Harry Gebhard

Taylor Wong

Raj Nangunoori

Franziska Anna Schmidt

Kosuke Sato

Roger Hartl

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Intraoperative image-guidance in spinal surgery has been influenced by various technological developments in imaging science since the early 1990s. The technology has evolved from simple fluoroscopic-based guidance to state-of-art intraoperative computed tomography (iCT)-based navigation systems. Although the intraoperative navigation is more commonly used in thoracolumbar spine surgery, this newer imaging platform has rapidly gained popularity in cervical approaches. The purpose of this manuscript is to address the applications of advanced image-guidance in cervical spine surgery and to describe the use of intraoperative neuro-navigation in surgical planning and execution. In this review, we aim to cover the following surgical techniques: anterior cervical approaches, atlanto-axial fixation, subaxial instrumentation, percutaneous interfacet cage implantation as well as minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. The currently available data suggested that the use of 3D navigation significantly reduces the screw malposition, operative time, mean blood loss, radiation exposure, and complication rates in comparison to the conventional fluoroscopic-guidance. With the advancements in technology and surgical techniques, 3D navigation has potential to replace conventional fluoroscopy completely.

Citing Articles

Analysis of influencing factors for complications of anterior thoracolumbar tuberculosis surgery in adults.

Lin W, Liu J, Zhan Z Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104(2):e41252.

PMID: 39792741 PMC: 11730105. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041252.

Image Quality Comparison of Three 3D Mobile X-Ray Imaging Guidance Devices Used in Spine Surgery: A Phantom Study.

Dabli D, Salvat C, Fitton I, Van Ngoc Ty C, Palanchon P, Beregi J Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(21).

PMID: 39517780 PMC: 11548279. DOI: 10.3390/s24216883.

Commentary on "Robotics in Cervical Spine Surgery: Feasibility and Safety of Posterior Screw Placement".

Vadala G, Ambrosio L, Denaro V Neurospine. 2023; 20(1):340-342.

PMID: 37016882 PMC: 10080415. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2346312.156.

Accuracies of various types of spinal robot in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Xie L, Wang Q, Zhang Q, He D, Tian W J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):243.

PMID: 36966314 PMC: 10039560. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03714-8.

Does the intraoperative 3D-flat panel control of the planned implant position lead to an optimization and increased in safety in the anatomically demanding region C1/2?.

Jarvers J, Spiegl U, Pieroh P, von der Hoh N, Volker A, Pfeifle C BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1):37.

PMID: 36803456 PMC: 9938545. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-01934-7.

References

Wang T, Lubelski D, Abdullah K, Steinmetz M, Benzel E, Mroz T . Rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion after initial posterior cervical foraminotomy. Spine J. 2013; 15(5):971-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.042. View

Spetzger U, Bertalanffy H, Naujokat C, von Keyserlingk D, Gilsbach J . Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Anatomical and surgical considerations. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997; 139(5):392-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF01808872. View

Dunlap B, Karaikovic E, Park H, Sokolowski M, Zhang L . Load sharing properties of cervical pedicle screw-rod constructs versus lateral mass screw-rod constructs. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(5):803-8. PMC: 2899970. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1278-0. View

Barnes A, Eguizabal J, Acosta Jr F, Lotz J, Buckley J, Ames C . Biomechanical pullout strength and stability of the cervical artificial pedicle screw. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(1):E16-20. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181891772. View

Goel A . Treatment of basilar invagination by atlantoaxial joint distraction and direct lateral mass fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004; 1(3):281-6. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.3.0281. View

Yoshihara H, Passias P, Errico T . Screw-related complications in the subaxial cervical spine with the use of lateral mass versus cervical pedicle screws: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 19(5):614-23. DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE13136. View

Nottmeier E, Pirris S, Edwards S, Kimes S, Bowman C, Nelson K . Operating room radiation exposure in cone beam computed tomography-based, image-guided spinal surgery: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 19(2):226-31. DOI: 10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12719. View

Offiah C, Day E . The craniocervical junction: embryology, anatomy, biomechanics and imaging in blunt trauma. Insights Imaging. 2016; 8(1):29-47. PMC: 5265194. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-016-0530-5. View

Bakhsheshian J, Mehta V, Liu J . Current Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Global Spine J. 2017; 7(6):572-586. PMC: 5582708. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217699208. View

10.

Grob D, Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Froehlich M, Hayek J . Posterior occipitocervical fusion. A preliminary report of a new technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991; 16(3 Suppl):S17-24. View

11.

Holly L, Foley K . Image guidance in spine surgery. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007; 38(3):451-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.04.001. View

12.

Hernandez R, Wipplinger C, Navarro-Ramirez R, Soriano-Solis S, Kirnaz S, Hussain I . Ten-Step Minimally Invasive Cervical Decompression via Unilateral Tubular Laminotomy: Technical Note and Early Clinical Experience. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019; 18(3):284-294. DOI: 10.1093/ons/opz156. View

13.

Ould-Slimane M, Ferracci F, Le Pape S, Perez A, Michelin P, Gauthe R . Posterior C1C2 harms fusion with 3D surgical navigation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018; 104(5):585-588. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.012. View

14.

Ludwig S, Kramer D, Vaccaro A, Albert T . Transpedicle screw fixation of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (359):77-88. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199902000-00009. View

15.

Arab A, AlKherayf F, Sachs A, Wai E . Use of 3D Navigation in Subaxial Cervical Spine Lateral Mass Screw Insertion. J Neurol Surg Rep. 2018; 79(1):e1-e8. PMC: 5818276. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1624574. View

16.

Foster M, Carleton-Bland N, Lee M, Jackson R, Clark S, Wilby M . Comparison of clinical outcomes in anterior cervical discectomy versus foraminotomy for brachialgia. Br J Neurosurg. 2018; 33(1):3-7. DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1527013. View

17.

Nazarian S, Louis R . Posterior internal fixation with screw plates in traumatic lesions of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991; 16(3 Suppl):S64-71. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199103001-00011. View

18.

Goel A . Interfacetal intra-articular spacers: Emergence of a concept. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2016; 7(2):72-4. PMC: 4872565. DOI: 10.4103/0974-8237.181825. View

19.

Navarro-Ramirez R, Lang G, Lian X, Berlin C, Janssen I, Jada A . Total Navigation in Spine Surgery; A Concise Guide to Eliminate Fluoroscopy Using a Portable Intraoperative Computed Tomography 3-Dimensional Navigation System. World Neurosurg. 2017; 100:325-335. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.025. View

20.

Bredow J, Oppermann J, Kraus B, Schiller P, Schiffer G, Sobottke R . The accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy-navigated screw insertion in the upper and subaxial cervical spine. Eur Spine J. 2015; 24(12):2967-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3974-2. View