» Articles » PMID: 33550381

Comparative Functional Anatomy of Marmoset Brains

Overview
Journal ILAR J
Date 2021 Feb 7
PMID 33550381
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Marmosets and closely related tamarins have become popular models for understanding aspects of human brain organization and function because they are small, reproduce and mature rapidly, and have few cortical fissures so that more cortex is visible and accessible on the surface. They are well suited for studies of development and aging. Because marmosets are highly social primates with extensive vocal communication, marmoset studies can inform theories of the evolution of language in humans. Most importantly, marmosets share basic features of major sensory and motor systems with other primates, including those of macaque monkeys and humans with larger and more complex brains. The early stages of sensory processing, including subcortical nuclei and several cortical levels for the visual, auditory, somatosensory, and motor systems, are highly similar across primates, and thus results from marmosets are relevant for making inferences about how these systems are organized and function in humans. Nevertheless, the structures in these systems are not identical across primate species, and homologous structures are much bigger and therefore function somewhat differently in human brains. In particular, the large human brain has more cortical areas that add to the complexity of information processing and storage, as well as decision-making, while making new abilities possible, such as language. Thus, inferences about human brains based on studies on marmoset brains alone should be made with a bit of caution.

Citing Articles

The central role of the individual in the history of brains.

Ghazanfar A, Gomez-Marin A Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024; 163:105744.

PMID: 38825259 PMC: 11246226. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105744.


The Subcortical Atlas of the Marmoset ("SAM") monkey based on high-resolution MRI and histology.

Saleem K, Avram A, Glen D, Schram V, Basser P Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(4).

PMID: 38647221 PMC: 11494440. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae120.


Induction of Anxiety-Like Phenotypes by Knockdown of Cannabinoid Type-1 Receptors in the Amygdala of Marmosets.

Zhu L, Zheng D, Li R, Shen C, Cai R, Lyu C Neurosci Bull. 2023; 39(11):1669-1682.

PMID: 37368194 PMC: 10603018. DOI: 10.1007/s12264-023-01081-2.


Marmoset core visual object recognition behavior is comparable to that of macaques and humans.

Kell A, Bokor S, Jeon Y, Toosi T, Issa E iScience. 2023; 26(1):105788.

PMID: 36594035 PMC: 9804140. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105788.


Sex differences in cognitive aging: a 4-year longitudinal study in marmosets.

Rothwell E, Workman K, Wang D, Lacreuse A Neurobiol Aging. 2021; 109:88-99.

PMID: 34700200 PMC: 8841951. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.09.015.


References
1.
Imig T, Ruggero M, Kitzes L, Javel E, Brugge J . Organization of auditory cortex in the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). J Comp Neurol. 1977; 171(1):111-28. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901710108. View

2.
Solomon S, Rosa M . A simpler primate brain: the visual system of the marmoset monkey. Front Neural Circuits. 2014; 8:96. PMC: 4126041. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2014.00096. View

3.
Carlson M, Huerta M, Cusick C, Kaas J . Studies on the evolution of multiple somatosensory representations in primates: the organization of anterior parietal cortex in the New World Callitrichid, Saguinus. J Comp Neurol. 1986; 246(3):409-26. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902460309. View

4.
Aitkin L, Merzenich M, Irvine D, Clarey J, Nelson J . Frequency representation in auditory cortex of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus jacchus). J Comp Neurol. 1986; 252(2):175-85. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902520204. View

5.
Bulkin D, Groh J . Systematic mapping of the monkey inferior colliculus reveals enhanced low frequency sound representation. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 105(4):1785-97. PMC: 3075276. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00857.2010. View