» Articles » PMID: 33549151

A CT-based Radiomics Nomogram for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Bone Tumours

Overview
Journal Cancer Imaging
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2021 Feb 7
PMID 33549151
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We sought to evaluate the performance of a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram we devised in distinguishing benign from malignant bone tumours.

Methods: Two hundred and six patients with bone tumours were spilt into two groups: a training set (n = 155) and a validation set (n = 51). A feature extraction process based on 3D Slicer software was used to extract the radiomics features from unenhanced CT images, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression was used to calculate the radiomic score to generate a radiomics signature. A clinical model comprised demographics and CT features. A radiomics nomogram combined with the clinical model and the radiomics signature was constructed. The performance of the three models was comprehensively evaluated from three aspects: identification ability, accuracy, and clinical value, allowing for generation of an optimal prediction model.

Results: The radiomics nomogram comprised clinical and radiomics signature features. The nomogram model displayed good performance in training and validation sets with areas under the curve of 0.917 and 0.823, respectively. The areas under the curve, decision curve analysis, and net reclassification improvement showed that the radiomics nomogram model could obtain better diagnostic performance than the clinical model and achieve greater clinical net benefits than the clinical and radiomics signature models alone.

Conclusions: We constructed a combined nomogram comprising a clinical model and radiomics signature as a noninvasive preoperative prediction method to distinguish between benign and malignant bone tumours and assist treatment planning.

Citing Articles

Radiomics model based on computed tomography images for prediction of radiation-induced optic neuropathy following radiotherapy of brain and head and neck tumors.

Nafchi E, Fadavi P, Amiri S, Cheraghi S, Garousi M, Nabavi M Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41409.

PMID: 39839516 PMC: 11750450. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41409.


Multiparameter computed tomography (CT) radiomics signature fusion-based model for the preoperative prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma nuclear grade: a multicenter development and external validation study.

Xv Y, Wei Z, Lv F, Jiang Q, Guo H, Zheng Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(10):7031-7045.

PMID: 39429571 PMC: 11485359. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-35.


The scoring system combined with radiomics and imaging features in predicting the malignant potential of incidental indeterminate small (<20 mm) solid pulmonary nodules.

Qu B, Wang Y, Pan Y, Cao P, Deng X BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):234.

PMID: 39243018 PMC: 11380408. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01413-2.


A Scalable Radiomics- and Natural Language Processing-Based Machine Learning Pipeline to Distinguish Between Painful and Painless Thoracic Spinal Bone Metastases: Retrospective Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

Naseri H, Skamene S, Tolba M, Faye M, Ramia P, Khriguian J JMIR AI. 2024; 2:e44779.

PMID: 38875572 PMC: 11041487. DOI: 10.2196/44779.


CT and MRI radiomics of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas: an updated systematic review of reproducibility and validation strategies.

Gitto S, Cuocolo R, Huisman M, Messina C, Albano D, Omoumi P Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):54.

PMID: 38411750 PMC: 10899555. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01614-x.


References
1.
Cao J, Xiao L, He B, Zhang G, Dong J, Wu Y . Diagnostic value of combined diffusion-weighted imaging with dynamic contrast enhancement MRI in differentiating malignant from benign bone lesions. Clin Radiol. 2017; 72(9):793.e1-793.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.04.017. View

2.
Ladd L, Roth T . Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Bone Tumors. Semin Roentgenol. 2017; 52(4):209-226. DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2017.04.006. View

3.
Piperkova E, Mikhaeil M, Mousavi A, Libes R, Viejo-Rullan F, Lin H . Impact of PET and CT in PET/CT studies for staging and evaluating treatment response in bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Clin Nucl Med. 2009; 34(3):146-50. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181966f9d. View

4.
Xu X, Qian W, Ma G, Hu H, Su G, Liu H . Combined diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for differentiating radiologically indeterminate malignant from benign orbital masses. Clin Radiol. 2017; 72(10):903.e9-903.e15. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.04.007. View

5.
Chen W, Giger M, Li H, Bick U, Newstead G . Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med. 2007; 58(3):562-71. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21347. View