» Articles » PMID: 33548767

Role of Nasal Vestibule Morphological Variations on Olfactory Airflow Dynamics

Overview
Date 2021 Feb 6
PMID 33548767
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The conductive mechanisms of olfaction are typically given little priority in the evaluation of olfactory function. The objective of this study is to investigate the role of nasal vestibule morphological variations on airflow volume at the olfactory recess in healthy subjects.

Methods: Anatomically realistic three-dimensional nasal airway models were constructed from computed tomography scans in five subjects. Each individual's unilateral nasal cavity (10 total) was classified according to the shape of their nasal vestibule: Standard, Notched, or Elongated. Nasal airflow simulations were performed using computational fluid dynamics modeling at two inspiratory flow rates (15 L/min and 30 L/min) to reflect resting and moderate breathing rates. Olfactory airflow volume and cross-sectional flow resistance were computed.

Findings: Average olfactory airflow volumes (and percent airflow in olfactory) were: 0.25 L/min to 0.64 L/min (3.0%-7.7%; 15 L/min simulations) and 0.53 L/min to 1.30 L/min (3.2%-7.8%; 30 L/min simulations) for Standard; 0.13 L/min - 0.47 L/min (2.0%-6.8%; 15 L/min simulations) and 0.06 L/min - 0.82 L/min (1.7%-6.1%; 30 L/min simulations) for Notched; and 0.07 L/min - 0.39 L/min (1.2%-5.4%; 15 L/min simulations) and 0.30 L/min - 0.99 L/min (2.1%-6.7%; 30 L/min simulations) for Elongated. On average, relative difference in olfactory resistance between left and right sides was 141.5% for patients with different unilateral phenotypes and 82.2% for patients with identical unilateral phenotype.

Interpretation: Olfactory cleft airflow volume was highest in the Standard nasal vestibule phenotype, followed by Notched phenotype for 15 L/min simulations and Elongated phenotype for 30 L/min simulations. Further, intra-patient variation in olfactory cleft airflow resistance differs greatly for patients with different unilateral phenotypes compared to patients with identical unilateral phenotype.

Citing Articles

Impact of Intra-Phenotypic Nasal Vestibular Variation on Local Airflow Dynamics.

Sicard R, Russel S, Jang D, Hachem R, Frank-Ito D Laryngoscope. 2024; 135(1):50-58.

PMID: 39166731 PMC: 11637973. DOI: 10.1002/lary.31688.


Nasal airway obstruction in patients with cleft lip nasal deformity: A systematic review.

Chiang H, Shah R, Washabaugh C, Frank-Ito D J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024; 92:48-60.

PMID: 38493539 PMC: 11098695. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.061.


Insights into exercise-induced rhinitis based on nasal aerodynamics induced by airway morphology.

Russel S, Gosman R, Gonzalez K, Wright J, Frank-Ito D Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2023; 319:104171.

PMID: 37813324 PMC: 11037931. DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2023.104171.


Olfactory drug delivery with intranasal sprays after nasal midvault reconstruction.

Chiang H, Martin H, Sicard R, Frank-Ito D Int J Pharm. 2023; 644:123341.

PMID: 37611854 PMC: 10621325. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123341.


Nasal anatomy and sniffing in respiration and olfaction of wild and domestic animals.

Xi J, Si X, Malve M Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1172140.

PMID: 37520001 PMC: 10375297. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1172140.


References
1.
Yokley T . Ecogeographic variation in human nasal passages. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008; 138(1):11-22. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20893. View

2.
Inthavong K, Ma J, Shang Y, Dong J, Chetty A, Tu J . Geometry and airflow dynamics analysis in the nasal cavity during inhalation. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2017; 66:97-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.10.006. View

3.
Ghalichi F, Deng X, De Champlain A, Douville Y, King M, Guidoin R . Low Reynolds number turbulence modeling of blood flow in arterial stenoses. Biorheology. 1999; 35(4-5):281-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-355x(99)80011-0. View

4.
Soler Z, Pallanch J, Sansoni E, Jones C, Lawrence L, Schlosser R . Volumetric computed tomography analysis of the olfactory cleft in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015; 5(9):846-54. PMC: 4560663. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21552. View

5.
Eiting T, Smith T, Perot J, Dumont E . The role of the olfactory recess in olfactory airflow. J Exp Biol. 2014; 217(Pt 10):1799-803. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.097402. View