» Articles » PMID: 33546128

Dietary Intake and Lifestyle Habits of Children Aged 10-12 Years Enrolled in the School Lunch Program in Greece: A Cross Sectional Analysis

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2021 Feb 6
PMID 33546128
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

School Lunch programs are a common strategy to address social inequalities in food access among children, especially food insecurity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dietary intake and lifestyle habits of children aged 10-12 years enrolled in the School Lunch Program in Greece. A cross-sectional survey of fifth and sixth grade students, School Lunch recipients (n = 609) and control subjects (n = 736), collected data on sociodemographic, nutritional and lifestyle habits via self-reported questionnaires during May-October 2019. Despite enrollment in the School Lunch Program children in this group reported consuming less meals during the day (3.47 ± 1.38 vs. 3.65 ± 1.35, = 0.002). No differences were seen in intakes of energy and macronutrients, however School Lunch recipients reported lower intakes of cereals/potatoes and legumes but higher fruit intake (2.32 ± 1.59 vs. 1.97 ± 1.72, < 0.05). School Lunch recipients reported 42min/d and 28min/d higher screen-time during weekdays and weekends, respectively. Linear regression highlighted that dietary quality was not associated with School Lunch enrollment but rather sleep duration and screen time had a stronger influence on dietary habits. Enrollment in a School Lunch Program was linked to sustained differences in sedentary lifestyle habits but less so in dietary habits.

Citing Articles

Investigating the Sociodemographic and Health Characteristics of Non-Sugar Sweeteners Consumption in Greek School-Aged Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Apergi K, Malisova O, Vlassopoulos A, Fidanoglou P, Kandyliari A, Kapsokefalou M Children (Basel). 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 39062262 PMC: 11274966. DOI: 10.3390/children11070813.


Screen time among school-aged children of aged 6-14: a systematic review.

Qi J, Yan Y, Yin H Glob Health Res Policy. 2023; 8(1):12.

PMID: 37076910 PMC: 10113131. DOI: 10.1186/s41256-023-00297-z.

References
1.
Turck D, Castenmiller J, de Henauw S, Hirsch-Ernst K, Kearney J, Knutsen H . Dietary reference values for sodium. EFSA J. 2020; 17(9):e05778. PMC: 7009309. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5778. View

2.
Yannakoulia M, Lykou A, Kastorini C, Saranti Papasaranti E, Petralias A, Veloudaki A . Socio-economic and lifestyle parameters associated with diet quality of children and adolescents using classification and regression tree analysis: the DIATROFI study. Public Health Nutr. 2015; 19(2):339-47. PMC: 10270971. DOI: 10.1017/S136898001500110X. View

3.
Arsenault J, Brown K . Dietary Protein Intake in Young Children in Selected Low-Income Countries Is Generally Adequate in Relation to Estimated Requirements for Healthy Children, Except When Complementary Food Intake Is Low. J Nutr. 2017; 147(5):932-939. PMC: 5404209. DOI: 10.3945/jn.116.239657. View

4.
Lucas P, Patterson E, Sacks G, Billich N, Evans C . Preschool and School Meal Policies: An Overview of What We Know about Regulation, Implementation, and Impact on Diet in the UK, Sweden, and Australia. Nutrients. 2017; 9(7). PMC: 5537850. DOI: 10.3390/nu9070736. View

5.
Jones B . Making time for family meals: Parental influences, home eating environments, barriers and protective factors. Physiol Behav. 2018; 193(Pt B):248-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.03.035. View