» Articles » PMID: 33544045

COVID-19 Versus Non-COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison of Demographics, Physiologic Parameters, Inflammatory Biomarkers, and Clinical Outcomes

Abstract

There is an urgent need for improved understanding of the mechanisms and clinical characteristics of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease (COVID-19). To compare key demographic and physiologic parameters, biomarkers, and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 ARDS and ARDS secondary to direct lung injury from other etiologies of pneumonia. We enrolled 27 patients with COVID-19 ARDS in a prospective, observational cohort study and compared them with a historical, pre-COVID-19 cohort of patients with viral ARDS ( = 14), bacterial ARDS ( = 21), and ARDS due to culture-negative pneumonia ( = 30). We recorded clinical demographics; measured respiratory mechanical parameters; collected serial peripheral blood specimens for measurement of plasma interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and IL-10; and followed patients prospectively for patient-centered outcomes. We conducted between-group comparisons with nonparametric tests and analyzed time-to-event outcomes with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Patients with COVID-19 ARDS had higher body mass index and were more likely to be Black, or residents of skilled nursing facilities, compared with those with non-COVID-19 ARDS ( < 0.05). Patients with COVID-19 had lower delivered minute ventilation compared with bacterial and culture-negative ARDS ( < 0.01) but not compared with viral ARDS. We found no differences in static compliance, hypoxemic indices, or carbon dioxide clearance between groups. Patients with COVID-19 had lower IL-6 levels compared with bacterial and culture-negative ARDS at early time points after intubation but no differences in IL-6 levels compared with viral ARDS. Patients with COVID-19 had longer duration of mechanical ventilation but similar 60-day mortality in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. COVID-19 ARDS bears several similarities to viral ARDS but demonstrates lower minute ventilation and lower systemic levels of IL-6 compared with bacterial and culture-negative ARDS. COVID-19 ARDS was associated with longer dependence on mechanical ventilation compared with non-COVID-19 ARDS. Such detectable differences of COVID-19 do not merit deviation from evidence-based management of ARDS but suggest priorities for clinical research to better characterize and treat this new clinical entity.

Citing Articles

What proteins and albumins in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and serum could tell us in COVID-19 and influenza acute respiratory distress syndrome on mechanical ventilation patient - A prospective double center study.

Svraka A, Svraka D, Azaric B, Malic J, Baric G, Kovacevic P J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2025; 11(1):64-69.

PMID: 40017475 PMC: 11864060. DOI: 10.2478/jccm-2025-0005.


Immunologic and inflammatory consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its implications in renal disease.

Naiditch H, Betts M, Larman H, Levi M, Rosenberg A Front Immunol. 2025; 15:1376654.

PMID: 40012912 PMC: 11861071. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1376654.


Ventilatory variables and computed tomography features in COVID-19 ARDS and non-COVID-19-related ARDS: a prospective observational cohort study.

Chiu L, Li H, Juan Y, Ko H, Kuo S, Lee C Eur J Med Res. 2025; 30(1):57.

PMID: 39875972 PMC: 11773838. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-025-02303-1.


Clinical and biologic profiles of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome by prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or emphysema; a cohort study.

Nath S, Qurashi H, Kitsios G, Bain W, Aneis H, Suber T Respir Res. 2024; 25(1):400.

PMID: 39516808 PMC: 11549746. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-024-03027-2.


Use of NIR in COVID-19 Screening: Proof of Principles for Future Application.

Martins M, Nascimento M, Leal L, Cardoso W, Nobre V, Ravetti C ACS Omega. 2024; 9(41):42448-42454.

PMID: 39431082 PMC: 11483380. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c06092.


References
1.
Gattinoni L, Coppola S, Cressoni M, Busana M, Rossi S, Chiumello D . COVID-19 Does Not Lead to a "Typical" Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020; 201(10):1299-1300. PMC: 7233352. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0817LE. View

2.
Brower R, Matthay M, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson B, Wheeler A . Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(18):1301-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. View

3.
Tobin M . Basing Respiratory Management of COVID-19 on Physiological Principles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020; 201(11):1319-1320. PMC: 7258630. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202004-1076ED. View

4.
Famous K, Delucchi K, Ware L, Kangelaris K, Liu K, Thompson B . Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Subphenotypes Respond Differently to Randomized Fluid Management Strategy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 195(3):331-338. PMC: 5328179. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201603-0645OC. View

5.
Richardson S, Hirsch J, Narasimhan M, Crawford J, McGinn T, Davidson K . Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020; 323(20):2052-2059. PMC: 7177629. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775. View