» Articles » PMID: 33539401

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Transiently Stimulates the Rate of Mineralization in a 3-dimensional Ring Culture Model of Osteogenesis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Feb 4
PMID 33539401
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) has shown efficacy in bone repair and yet the optimum characteristics of this modality and its molecular mechanism remain unclear. To determine the effects of timing of PEMF treatment, we present a novel three-dimensional culture model of osteogenesis that demonstrates strong de novo generation of collagen and mineral matrix and exhibits stimulation by PEMF in multiple stages over 62 days of culture. Mouse postnatal day 2 calvarial pre-osteoblasts were cast within and around Teflon rings by polymerization of fibrinogen and cultured suspended without contact with tissue culture plastic. Ring constructs were exposed to PEMF for 4h/day for the entire culture (Daily), or just during Day1-Day10, Day11-Day 27, or Day28-Day63 and cultured without PEMF for the preceding or remaining days, and compared to no-PEMF controls. PEMF was conducted as HF Physio, 40.85 kHz frequency with a 67 ms burst period and an amplitude of 1.19 mT. Osteogenesis was kinetically monitored by repeated fluorescence measurements of continuously present Alizarin Red S (ARS) and periodically confirmed by micro-CT. PEMF treatment induced early-onset and statistically significant transient stimulation (~4-fold) of the mineralization rate when PEMF was applied Daily, or during D1-D10 and D11-D27. Stimulation was apparent but not significant between D28-D63 by ARS but was significant at D63 by micro-CT. PEMF also shifted the micro-CT density profiles to higher densities in each PEMF treatment group. Ring culture generated tissue with a mineral:matrix ratio of 2.0 by thermogravimetric analysis (80% of the calvaria control), and the deposited crystal structure was 50% hydroxyapatite by X-ray diffraction (63% of the calvaria and femur controls), independent of PEMF. These results were consistent with backscatter, secondary electron, and elemental analysis by scanning electron microscopy. Thus, in a defined, strong osteogenic environment, PEMF applied at different times was capable of further stimulation of osteogenesis with the potential to enhance bone repair.

Citing Articles

Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Cervical Spine Fusion in Patients with Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis.

Lansford T, Campbell P, Hassanzadeh H, Weinstein M, Wind J, Beaumont A Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024; 16:122534.

PMID: 39698480 PMC: 11655132. DOI: 10.52965/001c.122534.


Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation in Lumbar Spine Fusion for Patients With Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis.

Weinstein M, Beaumont A, Campbell P, Hassanzadeh H, Patel V, Vokshoor A Int J Spine Surg. 2023; 17(6):816-823.

PMID: 37884337 PMC: 10753353. DOI: 10.14444/8549.


Ion channels as molecular targets of glioblastoma electrotherapy.

Abed T, Ganser K, Eckert F, Stransky N, M Huber S Front Cell Neurosci. 2023; 17:1133984.

PMID: 37006466 PMC: 10064067. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1133984.


Design, fabrication, and characterization of a multimodal reconfigurable bioreactor for bone tissue engineering.

Montorsi M, Genchi G, De Pasquale D, De Simoni G, Sinibaldi E, Ciofani G Biotechnol Bioeng. 2022; 119(7):1965-1979.

PMID: 35383894 PMC: 9324218. DOI: 10.1002/bit.28100.

References
1.
Matsumoto Y, Otsuka F, Takano-Narazaki M, Katsuyama T, Nakamura E, Tsukamoto N . Estrogen facilitates osteoblast differentiation by upregulating bone morphogenetic protein-4 signaling. Steroids. 2013; 78(5):513-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2013.02.011. View

2.
Dallas S, Prideaux M, Bonewald L . The osteocyte: an endocrine cell ... and more. Endocr Rev. 2013; 34(5):658-90. PMC: 3785641. DOI: 10.1210/er.2012-1026. View

3.
Henmi A, Okata H, Anada T, Yoshinari M, Mikami Y, Suzuki O . Bone matrix calcification during embryonic and postembryonic rat calvarial development assessed by SEM-EDX spectroscopy, XRD, and FTIR spectroscopy. J Bone Miner Metab. 2015; 34(1):41-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00774-014-0647-x. View

4.
Dallas S, Veno P . Live imaging of bone cell and organ cultures. Methods Mol Biol. 2011; 816:425-57. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-415-5_26. View

5.
Waldorff E, Zhang N, Ryaby J . Pulsed electromagnetic field applications: A corporate perspective. J Orthop Translat. 2018; 9:60-68. PMC: 5822965. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2017.02.006. View