» Articles » PMID: 33536797

Pharmacokinetics and Toxicities of Oral Docetaxel Formulations Co-Administered with Ritonavir in Phase I Trials

Overview
Journal Clin Pharmacol
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2021 Feb 4
PMID 33536797
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Docetaxel is widely used as intravenous (IV) chemotherapy. Oral docetaxel is co-administered with the cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitor ritonavir to increase oral bioavailability. This research explores the relationship between the pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicity of this novel oral chemotherapy.

Methods: The patients in two phase I trials were treated with different oral docetaxel formulations in combination with ritonavir in different dose levels, ranging from 20 to 80 mg docetaxel with 100 to 200 mg ritonavir a day. The patients were categorized based on the absence or occurrence of severe treatment-related toxicity (grade ≥3 or any grade leading to treatment alterations). The docetaxel area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (C) were associated with toxicity.

Results: Thirty-four out of 138 patients experienced severe toxicity, most frequently observed as mucositis, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. The severe toxicity group had a significantly higher docetaxel AUC (2231 ± 1405 vs 1011 ± 830 ng/mL*h, p<0.0001) and C (218 ± 178 vs 119 ± 77 ng/mL, p<0.0001) as compared to the patients without severe toxicity. When extrapolated from IV PK data, the patients without severe toxicity had a similar cumulative docetaxel AUC as with standard 3-weekly IV docetaxel, while the C was up to 10-fold lower with oral docetaxel and ritonavir.

Conclusion: Severe toxicity was observed in 25% of the patients treated with oral docetaxel and ritonavir. This toxicity seems related to the PK, as the docetaxel AUC and C were up to twofold higher in the severe toxicity group as compared to the non-severe toxicity group. Future randomized trials will provide a further evaluation of the toxicity and efficacy of the new weekly oral docetaxel and ritonavir regimen in comparison to standard IV docetaxel.

Citing Articles

Impact of loperamide on the pharmacokinetics and tissue disposition of ritonavir-boosted oral docetaxel therapy; a preclinical assessment.

Loos N, Bui V, de Jong D, Lebre M, Rosing H, Beijnen J Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2024; 94(1):79-87.

PMID: 38456955 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-024-04662-8.


The inhibitory and inducing effects of ritonavir on hepatic and intestinal CYP3A and other drug-handling proteins.

Loos N, Beijnen J, Schinkel A Biomed Pharmacother. 2023; 162:114636.

PMID: 37004323 PMC: 10065864. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114636.


Pharmacological Potential of Lathyrane-Type Diterpenoids from Phytochemical Sources.

Vela F, Ezzanad A, Hunter A, Macias-Sanchez A, Hernandez-Galan R Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022; 15(7).

PMID: 35890079 PMC: 9318715. DOI: 10.3390/ph15070780.


Ritonavir-Boosted Exposure of Kinase Inhibitors: an Open Label, Cross-over Pharmacokinetic Proof-of-Concept Trial with Erlotinib.

Boosman R, de Gooijer C, Groenland S, Burgers J, Baas P, van der Noort V Pharm Res. 2022; 39(4):669-676.

PMID: 35352280 PMC: 8964029. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-022-03244-8.

References
1.
Stemmler H, Harbeck N, Groll de Rivera I, Vehling Kaiser U, Rauthe G, Abenhardt W . Prospective multicenter randomized phase III study of weekly versus standard docetaxel (D2) for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Oncology. 2011; 79(3-4):197-203. DOI: 10.1159/000320640. View

2.
de Weger V, Stuurman F, Koolen S, Moes J, Hendrikx J, Sawicki E . A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Once-Weekly Oral Administration of Docetaxel as ModraDoc001 Capsule or ModraDoc006 Tablet in Combination with Ritonavir. Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 25(18):5466-5474. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2299. View

3.
Sawicki E, Beijnen J, Schellens J, Nuijen B . Pharmaceutical development of an oral tablet formulation containing a spray dried amorphous solid dispersion of docetaxel or paclitaxel. Int J Pharm. 2016; 511(2):765-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.07.068. View

4.
Borner M, Scheithauer W, Twelves C, Maroun J, Wilke H . Answering patients' needs: oral alternatives to intravenous therapy. Oncologist. 2001; 6 Suppl 4:12-6. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.6-suppl_4-12. View

5.
Le Lay K, Myon E, Hill S, Riou-Franca L, Scott D, Sidhu M . Comparative cost-minimisation of oral and intravenous chemotherapy for first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the UK NHS system. Eur J Health Econ. 2007; 8(2):145-51. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-006-0034-1. View