» Articles » PMID: 33536464

Perceived Stress As Mediator for Longitudinal Effects of the COVID-19 Lockdown on Wellbeing of Parents and Children

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Feb 4
PMID 33536464
Citations 114
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dealing with a COVID-19 lockdown may have negative effects on children, but at the same time might facilitate parent-child bonding. Perceived stress may influence the direction of these effects. Using a longitudinal twin design, we investigated how perceived stress influenced lockdown induced changes in wellbeing of parents and children. A total of 106 parents and 151 children (10-13-year-olds) filled in questionnaires during lockdown and data were combined with data of previous years. We report a significant increase in parental negative feelings (anxiety, depression, hostility and interpersonal sensitivity). Longitudinal child measures showed a gradual decrease in internalizing and externalizing behavior, which seemed decelerated by the COVID-19 lockdown. Changes in parental negative feelings and children's externalizing behavior were mediated by perceived stress: higher scores prior to the lockdown were related to more stress during the lockdown, which in turn was associated with an increase in parental negative feelings and children's' externalizing behavior. Perceived stress in parents and children was associated with negative coping strategies. Additionally, children's stress levels were influenced by prior and current parental overreactivity. These results suggest that children in families with negative coping strategies and (a history of) parental overreactivity might be at risk for negative consequences of the lockdown.

Citing Articles

Parental Mental Health and Child Maltreatment in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Importance of Sampling in a Quantitative Statistical Study.

Engelke L, Calvano C, Pohl S, Winter S, Renneberg B J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e52043.

PMID: 39854726 PMC: 11806267. DOI: 10.2196/52043.


Knowledge of COVID-19 and the psychological status of parents: a retrospective survey in Wuhan, Hubei.

Wang L, Gan H, Zhang Y, Xiong C, Wang G, Mei C BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e083653.

PMID: 39773783 PMC: 11749062. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083653.


Neural correlates of vicarious reward processing and peer victimization experiences in late childhood.

Dobbelaar S, Kellij S, Veenstra R, Guroglu B Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 71():101499.

PMID: 39733500 PMC: 11743848. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101499.


Trends in changes of family functioning during different phases of the pandemic - findings across four population-based surveys between 2020 to 2023 in Germany.

Geprags A, Burgin D, Fegert J, Brahler E, Clemens V BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3230.

PMID: 39567945 PMC: 11580525. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20650-2.


Long-term effects of changes in coparenting quality during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conway C, Feinberg M J Fam Psychol. 2024; 39(1):22-31.

PMID: 39446620 PMC: 11887928. DOI: 10.1037/fam0001276.


References
1.
Preacher K, Hayes A . Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(3):879-91. DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879. View

2.
Doupnik S, Hill D, Palakshappa D, Worsley D, Bae H, Shaik A . Parent Coping Support Interventions During Acute Pediatric Hospitalizations: A Meta-Analysis. Pediatrics. 2017; 140(3). PMC: 5574731. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-4171. View

3.
Masten A, Motti-Stefanidi F . Multisystem Resilience for Children and Youth in Disaster: Reflections in the Context of COVID-19. Advers Resil Sci. 2020; 1(2):95-106. PMC: 7314620. DOI: 10.1007/s42844-020-00010-w. View

4.
Andrews J, Foulkes L, Blakemore S . Peer Influence in Adolescence: Public-Health Implications for COVID-19. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020; 24(8):585-587. PMC: 7205648. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.001. View

5.
Bonanno G, Brewin C, Kaniasty K, La Greca A . Weighing the Costs of Disaster: Consequences, Risks, and Resilience in Individuals, Families, and Communities. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2015; 11(1):1-49. DOI: 10.1177/1529100610387086. View