Dosimetric Assessment of Brass Mesh Bolus and Transparent Polymer-gel Type Bolus for Commonly Used Breast Treatment Delivery Techniques
Affiliations
We investigated skin dose enhancements of brass mesh bolus (BMB) and a recently developed transparent polymer-gel bolus (PGB) for clinically relevant breast treatment delivery techniques. The dose enhancement of the breast surface with BMB and PGB were compared to that of tissue-equivalent bolus. Three breast treatment plans were generated on CT scans of an anthropomorphic chest phantom: tangential step-and-shoot 3D conformal (3DCRT) planned using Field-in-Field (FiF), tangential sliding-window 3DCRT using Electronic Compensator (EC), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). All plans were created using 6 MV photons and a prescription dose (Rx) of 180 cGy per fraction. Skin doses of all 3 plans were measured with radiochromic films, separately delivered in triplicate. Each plan was delivered to the phantom without bolus, and then with BMB (1 or 2 layers; 3 or 10 mm tissue-equivalent), PGB, and Superflab (3, 5, and 10 mm tissue-equivalent). Doses were determined by reading the radiochromic films with a flatbed scanner, and analyzing the images using a calibration curve for each specific batch. For all bolus types and plans, surface doses averaged over the 3 measurements were between 88.4% and 107.4% of Rx. Without bolus, average measured skin doses were between 51.2% and 64.2% of Rx. Skin doses with BMB and PGB were comparable to that with tissue-equivalent bolus. Over all 3 treatment delivery techniques, using BMB resulted in average skin doses of 92.8% and 102.1% for 1- and 2 layers, respectively, and using PGB results in average skin doses of 94.8%, 98.2%, and 99.7% for 3, 5, and 10-mm tissue-equivalent, respectively. The average measured skin doses with BMB and PGB agreed within ± 3% compared to the tissue-equivalent thickness bolus. We concluded that BMB and PGB are clinically equivalent in skin dose enhancement for breast treatment as the 3, 5, and 10 mm tissue-equivalent bolus.
Chen X, Xu C, Zeng L, Huang X, Chen A, Liu L Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 23:15330338241229367.
PMID: 38297814 PMC: 10832424. DOI: 10.1177/15330338241229367.
Keiper T, Kisling K, Hua P, Manger R J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(9):e14054.
PMID: 37287131 PMC: 10476985. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14054.
Lobo D, Banerjee S, Srinivas C, Athiyamaan M, Reddy S, Sunny J J Med Phys. 2022; 46(4):324-333.
PMID: 35261503 PMC: 8853458. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_59_21.