» Articles » PMID: 33531903

Determination and Pharmacokinetics of Omeprazole Enantiomers in Human Plasma and Oral Fluid Utilizing Microextraction by Packed Sorbent and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Overview
Journal Int J Anal Chem
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2021 Feb 3
PMID 33531903
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the present work, the determination of omeprazole (OME) enantiomers in oral fluid and plasma samples was carried out utilizing microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A chiral column with cellulose-SB phase was used for the first time for enantiomeric separation of OME with an isocratic elution system using 0.2% ammonium hydroxide in hexane-ethanol mixture (70 : 30, v/v) as the mobile phase. OME enantiomers were determined utilizing a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer in positive ion mode (ESI+) monitoring mass transitions: / 346.3 ⟶ 198.0 for OME and / 369.98 ⟶ 252.0 for internal standard. The limits of detection and quantification of the present method for both enantiomers were 0.1 and 0.4 ng/mL, respectively. The method validation provided good accuracy and precision. The matrix effect factor was less than 5%, and no interfering peaks were observed. The interday precision values ranged from 2.2 to 7.5 (%RSD), and the accuracy of determinations varied from -9.9% to 8.3%. In addition, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of omeprazole enantiomers in healthy subjects after a single oral dose was investigated. (S)-Enantiomers showed higher levels than (R)-enantiomers throughout 24 h. It was found that the mean maximum concentrations of (R)- and (S)-omeprazole in plasma samples were about two times higher than in oral fluid.

Citing Articles

Greenness assessment of microextraction techniques in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Pour P, Suzaei F, Daryanavard S Bioanalysis. 2024; 16(8):249-278.

PMID: 38466891 PMC: 11216521. DOI: 10.4155/bio-2023-0266.


Solid Phase-Based Microextraction Techniques in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Soares S, Rosado T, Barroso M, Gallardo E Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(4).

PMID: 37111541 PMC: 10142207. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041055.


Polymorphism Influence in PK/PD Model of Naproxen and 6-O-Desmethylnaproxen in Oral Fluid.

Oliveira G, Dionisio T, Siqueira-Sandrin V, Ferrari L, Bolani B, Parisi V Metabolites. 2022; 12(11).

PMID: 36422246 PMC: 9694679. DOI: 10.3390/metabo12111106.

References
1.
Liu J, Duan Y . Saliva: a potential media for disease diagnostics and monitoring. Oral Oncol. 2012; 48(7):569-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.01.021. View

2.
Lind T, Rydberg L, Kyleback A, Jonsson A, Andersson T, Hasselgren G . Esomeprazole provides improved acid control vs. omeprazole In patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000; 14(7):861-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00813.x. View

3.
Song Q, Naidong W . Analysis of omeprazole and 5-OH omeprazole in human plasma using hydrophilic interaction chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-MS/MS)--eliminating evaporation and reconstitution steps in 96-well liquid/liquid extraction. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005; 830(1):135-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.10.042. View

4.
Altun Z, Hjelmstrom A, Abdel-Rehim M, Blomberg L . Surface modified polypropylene pipette tips packed with a monolithic plug of adsorbent for high-throughput sample preparation. J Sep Sci. 2007; 30(12):1964-72. DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200600523. View

5.
Andersson T, Rohss K, Bredberg E, Hassan-Alin M . Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 15(10):1563-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01087.x. View