» Articles » PMID: 33529546

Evolutionary Novelty in Communication Between the Sexes

Overview
Journal Biol Lett
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Feb 2
PMID 33529546
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The diversity of signalling traits within and across taxa is vast and striking, prompting us to consider how novelty evolves in the context of animal communication. Sexual selection contributes to diversification, and here we endeavour to understand the initial conditions that facilitate the maintenance or elimination of new sexual signals and receiver features. New sender and receiver variants can occur through mutation, plasticity, hybridization and cultural innovation, and the initial conditions of the sender, the receiver and the environment then dictate whether a novel cue becomes a signal. New features may arise in the sender, the receiver or both simultaneously. We contend that it may be easier than assumed to evolve new sexual signals because sexual signals may be arbitrary, sexual conflict is common and receivers are capable of perceiving much more of the world than just existing sexual signals. Additionally, changes in the signalling environment can approximate both signal and receiver changes through a change in transmission characteristics of a given environment or the use of new environments. The Anthropocene has led to wide-scale disruption of the environment and may thus generate opportunity to directly observe the evolution of new signals to address questions that are beyond the reach of phylogenetic approaches.

Citing Articles

Regulatory Changes in the Fatty Acid Elongase Underlie the Evolution of Sex-specific Pheromone Profiles in .

Luo Y, Takau A, Li J, Fan T, Hopkins B, Le Y bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39464098 PMC: 11507777. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.09.617394.


Multimodal duetting in katydids under bat predation risk: a winning strategy for both sexes.

Saha K, Joshi K, Balakrishnan R Biol Lett. 2023; 19(5):20230110.

PMID: 37194255 PMC: 10189300. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0110.


Evolution of acoustic signals associated with cooperative parental behavior in a poison frog.

Moss J, Tumulty J, Fischer E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(17):e2218956120.

PMID: 37071680 PMC: 10151463. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2218956120.


Decoupling of sexual signals and their underlying morphology facilitates rapid phenotypic diversification.

Gallagher J, Zonana D, Broder E, Herner B, Tinghitella R Evol Lett. 2022; 6(6):474-489.

PMID: 36579170 PMC: 9783451. DOI: 10.1002/evl3.302.


Convergent and divergent neural circuit architectures that support acoustic communication.

Kelley D Front Neural Circuits. 2022; 16:976789.

PMID: 36466364 PMC: 9712726. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2022.976789.


References
1.
Kight C, Swaddle J . How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an integrative, mechanistic review. Ecol Lett. 2011; 14(10):1052-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x. View

2.
Leduc-Robert G, Maddison W . Phylogeny with introgression in Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). BMC Evol Biol. 2018; 18(1):24. PMC: 5824460. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-018-1137-x. View

3.
Feng A, Narins P, Xu C, Lin W, Yu Z, Qiu Q . Ultrasonic communication in frogs. Nature. 2006; 440(7082):333-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature04416. View

4.
Tucker M, Gerhardt H . Parallel changes in mate-attracting calls and female preferences in autotriploid tree frogs. Proc Biol Sci. 2011; 279(1733):1583-7. PMC: 3282346. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1968. View

5.
Gerhardt H, Humfeld S, Marshall V . Temporal order and the evolution of complex acoustic signals. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1619):1789-94. PMC: 2173945. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0451. View