Alpha 2.0
Login Register
» Articles » PMID: 33523910

Systemic Inequalities for LGBTQ Professionals in STEM

Overview
Journal Sci Adv
Specialties Biology
Science
Date 2021 Feb 1
PMID 33523910
Citations 64
Authors
E A Cech
T J Waidzunas
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Researchers have documented race and gender inequality in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) for decades. Do lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) professionals face parallel experiences of disadvantage in STEM? Using representative survey data from 21 STEM professional societies ( = 25,324; = 1006), this paper presents multidimensional and methodologically robust documentation of 5 dimensions of LGBTQ inequality in STEM. Controlling for variation by demographic, discipline, and job factors, LGBTQ STEM professionals were more likely to experience career limitations, harassment, and professional devaluation than their non-LGBTQ peers. They also reported more frequent health difficulties and were more likely to intend to leave STEM. These trends were similar across STEM disciplines and employment sectors. We found no differences by LGBTQ status in education level, work effort, or job commitment. These findings reveal LGBTQ status as a clear axis of inequality in STEM and motivate further research into the mechanisms producing such outcomes.

Citing Articles

Perceived sexual harassment and gender differences in anesthesiology: a cross-sectional survey.

Shenoy R, Harter R, Uribe A, Abdel-Rasoul M, Tishko J, Weaver T Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1478340.

PMID: 40013046 PMC: 11864136. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1478340.

Centering voices of scientists from marginalized backgrounds to understand experiences in climate adaptation science and inform action.

Marjadi M, Smith R, Tu H, Ajmani A, Holland A, Lopez B PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318438.

PMID: 39982937 PMC: 11844896. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318438.

Queer voices in computational biology: the first ISCB LGBTQI+ Symposium.

Parra R, Wass M, Munholland S, Wiper M, Kovats D, Pantano L Bioinform Adv. 2025; 5(1):vbae204.

PMID: 39927293 PMC: 11804971. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbae204.

Championing queer scientists of colour: 'I don't think we've scratched the surface on systemic exclusion'.

Enticknap G Nature. 2025; .

PMID: 39821107 DOI: 10.1038/d41586-024-04069-8.

Women in Autophagy: an initiative to promote gender parity in science.

McCabe M, Boya P, Chen R, Chu C, Colombo M, Delgui L Nat Cell Biol. 2024; 26(12):2009-2012.

PMID: 39622983 DOI: 10.1038/s41556-024-01566-w.

References
1.
Cech E, Pham M . Queer in STEM Organizations: Workplace Disadvantages for LGBT Employees in STEM Related Federal Agencies. Soc Sci. 2024; 6(1). PMC: 10978046. DOI: 10.3390/socsci6010012. View
2.
Cech E, Rothwell W . LGBTQ Inequality in Engineering Education. J Eng Edu. 2023; 107(4):583-610. PMC: 10544662. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20239. View
3.
Attell B, Kummerow Brown K, Treiber L . Workplace bullying, perceived job stressors, and psychological distress: Gender and race differences in the stress process. Soc Sci Res. 2017; 65:210-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.02.001. View
4.
Levine S, Apfelbaum E, Bernard M, Bartelt V, Zajac E, Stark D . Ethnic diversity deflates price bubbles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(52):18524-9. PMC: 4284549. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407301111. View
5.
Mattheis A, De Arellano D, Yoder J . A Model of Queer STEM Identity in the Workplace. J Homosex. 2019; 67(13):1839-1863. DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2019.1610632. View