» Articles » PMID: 3352332

Methods for Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Specific Medical Encounters

Overview
Journal Med Care
Specialty Health Services
Date 1988 Apr 1
PMID 3352332
Citations 113
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper presents the results of two studies that compared methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. One form used six-point response scales ranging from "very satisfied" to "very dissatisfied" (S6 scale); the other used five-point scales ranging from "excellent" to "poor" (E5 scale). Forms were assigned randomly to outpatients in fee-for-service (N = 136) and prepaid systems of care (N = 363) and were compared in terms of response variability, reliability, and validity. In both studies, the E5 scales showed greater response variability and better predicted whether patients intended to return to the same doctor in the future, recommend the doctor to a friend, and comply with the medical regimen. Reliability was satisfactory and did not differ between methods. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for constructing visit-specific satisfaction rating scales.

Citing Articles

Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcome after proximal hamstring tendon repair at mean 3 years follow-up.

Sgustav C, Lacheta L, Stockle U, Akgun D, Geisel D, Park H Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025; 145(1):130.

PMID: 39812698 PMC: 11735579. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05684-w.


The influence of healthcare service quality on patients' satisfaction in urban areas: The case of Pakistan.

Rauf A, Muhammad N, Mahmood H, Yee Yen Y Heliyon. 2024; 10(18):e37506.

PMID: 39323768 PMC: 11422050. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37506.


Improving pain communication between limited English-speaking Hmong patients, medical interpreters, and health care providers in primary care: A pilot study.

Lor M, Li A, Brown R, Swedlund M, Hawkins J, Nolander E Res Nurs Health. 2024; 47(3):289-301.

PMID: 38175545 PMC: 11079862. DOI: 10.1002/nur.22363.


Patient satisfaction with advanced physiotherapy practice internationally: Protocol for a systematic mixed studies review.

Davis C, Noblet T, Mistry J, Kowalski K, Rushton A PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0293170.

PMID: 37862302 PMC: 10588830. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293170.


The Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition.

Rogers M, Ou Z, Clawson J, Presson A, Stockburger C, Kazmers N J Hand Surg Am. 2023; 48(12):1218-1228.

PMID: 37737802 PMC: 10841050. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.08.010.