» Articles » PMID: 33522926

A Hybrid, Effectiveness-implementation Research Study Protocol Targeting Antenatal Care Providers to Provide Female Genital Mutilation Prevention and Care Services in Guinea, Kenya and Somalia

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 Feb 1
PMID 33522926
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In settings with high prevalence of female genital mutilation (FGM), the health sector could play a bigger role in its prevention and care of women and girls who have undergone this harmful practice. However, ministries of health lack clear policies, strategic plans or dedicated funding to implement anti-FGM interventions. Along with limited relevant knowledge and skills to prevent the practice of FGM and care for girls and women living with FGM, health providers have limited interpersonal communication skills and self-efficacy, while some may have supportive attitudes towards FGM and its medicalization. We propose to test the effectiveness of a health system strengthening intervention that includes training antenatal care (ANC) providers on person-centred communication (PCC) for FGM prevention.

Methods: This will be a two-level, hybrid, effectiveness-implementation research study using a cluster randomized trial design in Guinea, Kenya and Somalia conducted over a 6 months period. In each country, within pre-selected regions/counties, 60 ANC clinics will be randomized to intervention and control arms. At baseline, all clinics will receive the level one intervention involving provision of FGM-related clinical guidelines and handbook as well as anti-FGM policies and posters. At month 3, intervention clinics will receive the level two intervention comprising of a training for ANC providers on PCC to challenge their FGM-related attitudes and build their communication skills to effectively provide FGM prevention counselling. A process evaluation will be conducted to understand 'how' and 'why' the intervention package achieves intended results. Multi-level regression modelling will be used for quantitative data analysis while qualitative data will be assessed using thematic content analysis to determine the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of the different intervention levels.

Discussion: The proposed study will strengthen the knowledge base regarding how to effectively involve health providers in FGM prevention and care.

Trial Registration: Trial registration and date: PACTR201906696419769 (June 3rd, 2019).

Citing Articles

Cluster randomised trial of a health system strengthening approach applying person-centred communication for the prevention of female genital mutilation in Guinea, Kenya and Somalia.

Balde M, Ndavi P, Mochache V, Soumah A, Esho T, Kingoo J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(7):e078771.

PMID: 38964796 PMC: 11227771. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078771.


Evaluating the long-term impact of large-scale trainings: an exposure based cross-sectional study on female genital mutilation-related knowledge, attitudes and practices among Sudanese midwives in Khartoum State.

Ahmed W, Abdelrahim M, Gloyd S, Farquhar C, Puttkammer N BMJ Open. 2024; 14(1):e076830.

PMID: 38216199 PMC: 10806691. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076830.


National and international programmatic perspective on facilitators and barriers for Sudan's health sector response on female genital mutilation (2016-2018): a qualitative study.

Ahmed W, Adam A, Puttkammer N, Gloyd S, Farquhar C BMJ Open. 2023; 13(6):e070138.

PMID: 37316320 PMC: 10367081. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070138.


Lessons learnt in scaling up evidence-based comprehensive health sector responses addressing female genital mutilation in highly prevalent settings.

Ahmed W, Gebretsadik E, Gbenou D, Hien Y, Dramou B, Ambelu H BMJ Glob Health. 2023; 8(6).

PMID: 37308264 PMC: 10277070. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012270.


Turning the tide on female genital mutilation in a high prevalence country: a programmatic data analysis for Sudan's comprehensive health sector response, 2016-2018.

Ahmed W, Puttkammer N, Gloyd S, Adam A, Eltayeb D, Farquhar C BMJ Glob Health. 2022; 7(10).

PMID: 36270660 PMC: 9594515. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010020.


References
1.
Chandra-Mouli V, Ferguson B, Plesons M, Paul M, Chalasani S, Amin A . The Political, Research, Programmatic, and Social Responses to Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in the 25 Years Since the International Conference on Population and Development. J Adolesc Health. 2019; 65(6S):S16-S40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.09.011. View

2.
Abdulcadir J, Say L, Pallitto C . What do we know about assessing healthcare students and professionals' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding female genital mutilation? A systematic review. Reprod Health. 2017; 14(1):64. PMC: 5441029. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-017-0318-1. View

3.
Berg R, Denison E . Effectiveness of interventions designed to prevent female genital mutilation/cutting: a systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2012; 43(2):135-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00311.x. View

4.
Epstein R, Franks P, Fiscella K, Shields C, Meldrum S, Kravitz R . Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 61(7):1516-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.001. View

5.
Jacoby S, Smith A . Increasing certified nurse-midwives' confidence in managing the obstetric care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013; 58(4):451-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00262.x. View