» Articles » PMID: 33520668

Who Comes to a Self-help Depression Prevention Website? Characteristics of Spanish- and English-speaking Visitors

Overview
Journal Internet Interv
Date 2021 Feb 1
PMID 33520668
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To describe demographic and clinical characteristics of Spanish- and English-speaking visitors to a "Healthy Mood" website.

Methods: An online study intended to prevent depression by teaching users mood management skills recruited participants globally using primarily Google Ads. Those who consented responded to the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the MDE Screener (Muñoz, 1998) upon entry into the study.

Results: 1423 participants consented, 437 English speakers and 986 Spanish speakers. Of the 1271 participants with sufficient depression symptom data, 65% screened positive for a current major depressive episode, 30% were at high risk for onset of a major depressive episode, and 5% were in the low-risk category.

Conclusion: Websites intended to be preventive appear to attract primarily individuals who are currently experiencing enough symptoms to screen positive for a major depressive episode. Only 30% of participants were appropriate for a depression prevention intervention. Therefore, such sites must be ready to encourage those with current depression to obtain professional help as well as ensure that the online self-help interventions are appropriate for participants who could benefit from both preventive and treatment interventions.

Citing Articles

Satisfaction and Acceptability Ratings of a Web-Based Self-help Intervention for Depression: Retrospective Cross-sectional Study From a Resource-Limited Country.

Lara M, Patino P, Tiburcio M, Navarrete L JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(4):e29566.

PMID: 35377324 PMC: 9016498. DOI: 10.2196/29566.


General Practice and Digital Methods to Recruit Stroke Survivors to a Clinical Mobility Study: Comparative Analysis.

Reuter K, Liu C, Le N, Angyan P, Finley J J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(10):e28923.

PMID: 34643544 PMC: 8552096. DOI: 10.2196/28923.

References
1.
Curry S, Krist A, Owens D, Barry M, Caughey A, Davidson K . Interventions to Prevent Perinatal Depression: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2019; 321(6):580-587. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.0007. View

2.
Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, Saraceno B . The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ. 2005; 82(11):858-66. PMC: 2623050. DOI: /S0042-96862004001100011. View

3.
Rentsch D, Dumont P, Borgacci S, Carballeira Y, deTonnac N, Archinard M . Prevalence and treatment of depression in a hospital department of internal medicine. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006; 29(1):25-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.08.008. View

4.
Haberer J, Trabin T, Klinkman M . Furthering the reliable and valid measurement of mental health screening, diagnoses, treatment and outcomes through health information technology. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013; 35(4):349-53. PMC: 3692579. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.009. View

5.
Walker J, Burke K, Wanat M, Fisher R, Fielding J, Mulick A . The prevalence of depression in general hospital inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of interview-based studies. Psychol Med. 2018; 48(14):2285-2298. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291718000624. View