» Articles » PMID: 33519786

Evaluation of Live Bacterial Prophylactics to Decrease IncF Plasmid Transfer and Association With Intestinal Small RNAs

Overview
Journal Front Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2021 Feb 1
PMID 33519786
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chicken intestinal are a reservoir for virulence and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes that are often carried on incompatibility group F (IncF) plasmids. The rapid transfer of these plasmids between bacteria in the gut contributes to the emergence of new multidrug-resistant and virulent bacteria that threaten animal agriculture and human health. Thus, the aim of the present study was to determine whether live bacterial prophylactics could affect the distribution of large virulence plasmids and AMR in the intestinal tract and the potential role of smRNA in this process. In this study, we tested ∼100 randomly selected from pullet feces ( = 3 per group) given no treatment (CON), probiotics (PRO), a live vaccine (VAX), or both (P + V). isolates were evaluated via plasmid profiles and several phenotypic (siderophore production and AMR), and genotypic (PCR for virulence genes and plasmid typing) screens. P + V isolates exhibited markedly attenuated siderophore production, lack of AMR and virulence genes, which are all related to the loss of IncF and ColV plasmids ( < 0.0001). To identify a causal mechanism, we evaluated smRNA levels in the ceca mucus and found a positive association between smRNA concentrations and plasmid content, with both being significantly reduced in P + V birds compared to other groups ( < 0.01). To test this positive association between IncF plasmid transfer and host smRNA concentration, we evenly pooled smRNA per group and treated mating pairs with serial concentrations of smRNA . Higher smRNA concentrations resulted in greater rates of IncF plasmid transfer between donors (APEC O2 or VAX isolate IA-EC-001) and recipient (HS-4) (all groups; < 0.05). Finally, RNAHybrid predictive analyses detected several chicken miRNAs that hybridize with pilus assembly and plasmid transfer genes on the IncF plasmid pAPEC-O2-R. Overall, we demonstrated P + V treatment reduced smRNA levels in the chicken ceca, which was associated with a reduction in potentially virulent . Furthermore, we propose a novel mechanism in which intestinal smRNAs signal plasmid exchange between . Investigations to understand the changes in bacterial gene expression as well as smRNAs responsible for this phenomenon are currently underway.

Citing Articles

Dietary zinc supplementation inhibits bacterial plasmid conjugation by regulating plasmid replication () and transfer () genes.

Ott L, Smith C, Mellata M Appl Environ Microbiol. 2024; 90(10):e0148024.

PMID: 39360838 PMC: 11497784. DOI: 10.1128/aem.01480-24.


A Scoping Review of Antimicrobial Usage and Antimicrobial Resistance in Beef Cow-Calf Herds in the United States and Canada.

Wilhelm B, Fossen J, Gow S, Waldner C Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(7).

PMID: 37508273 PMC: 10376086. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12071177.


Gut Microbiota-MicroRNA Interactions in Intestinal Homeostasis and Cancer Development.

Nikolaieva N, Sevcikova A, Omelka R, Martiniakova M, Mego M, Ciernikova S Microorganisms. 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36677399 PMC: 9867529. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11010107.


Models for Gut-Mediated Horizontal Gene Transfer by Bacterial Plasmid Conjugation.

Ott L, Mellata M Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:891548.

PMID: 35847067 PMC: 9280185. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.891548.

References
1.
Torreblanca J, Marques S, Casadesus J . Synthesis of FinP RNA by plasmids F and pSLT is regulated by DNA adenine methylation. Genetics. 1999; 152(1):31-45. PMC: 1460579. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/152.1.31. View

2.
Johnson T, Wannemuehler Y, Johnson S, Logue C, White D, Doetkott C . Plasmid replicon typing of commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73(6):1976-83. PMC: 1828809. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02171-06. View

3.
Johnson T, Nolan L . Pathogenomics of the virulence plasmids of Escherichia coli. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009; 73(4):750-74. PMC: 2786578. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00015-09. View

4.
Duan H, Chai T, Cai Y, Zhong Z, Yao M, Zhang X . Transmission identification of Escherichia coli aerosol in chicken houses to their environments using ERIC-PCR. Sci China C Life Sci. 2008; 51(2):164-73. PMC: 7089447. DOI: 10.1007/s11427-008-0021-0. View

5.
Bej A, Dicesare J, Haff L, Atlas R . Detection of Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. in water by using the polymerase chain reaction and gene probes for uid. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991; 57(4):1013-7. PMC: 182838. DOI: 10.1128/aem.57.4.1013-1017.1991. View