» Articles » PMID: 33518852

Vulnerable Boys: Short-term and Long-term Gender Differences in the Impacts of Adolescent Disadvantage

Overview
Date 2021 Feb 1
PMID 33518852
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The growing gender gap in educational attainment between men and women has raised concerns that the skill development of boys may be more sensitive to family disadvantage than that of girls. Using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) data we find, as do previous studies, that boys are more likely to experience increased problems in school relative to girls, including suspensions and reduced educational aspirations, when they are in poor quality schools, less-educated neighborhoods, and father-absent households. Following these cohorts into young adulthood, however, we find no evidence that adolescent disadvantage has stronger negative impacts on long-run economic outcomes such as college graduation, employment, or income for men, relative to women. We do find that father absence is more strongly associated with men's marriage and childbearing and weak support for greater male vulnerability to disadvantage in rates of high school graduation. An investigation of adult outcomes for another recent cohort from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1997 produces a similar pattern of results. We conclude that focusing on gender differences in behavior in school may not lead to valid inferences about the effects of disadvantage on adult skills.

Citing Articles

Parental smoking is associated with adolescent loneliness: evidence from 71 low- and middle-income countries.

Xie J, Yang H, Zhao M, Magnussen C, Xi B Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1497136.

PMID: 40078776 PMC: 11896867. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1497136.


Males at the Tails: How Socioeconomic Status Shapes the Gender Gap.

Autor D, Figlio D, Karbownik K, Roth J, Wasserman M Econ J (London). 2023; 133(656):3136-3152.

PMID: 37808479 PMC: 10558139. DOI: 10.1093/ej/uead069.


Short-run and Long-run Effects of Peers from Disrupted Families.

Lei Z J Popul Econ. 2022; 35(3):1007-1036.

PMID: 35599989 PMC: 9119290. DOI: 10.1007/s00148-021-00839-0.


Educational Gender Gaps.

Lundberg S South Econ J. 2021; 87(2):416-439.

PMID: 33518817 PMC: 7842519. DOI: 10.1002/soej.12460.

References
1.
Norberg K . Partnership status and the human sex ratio at birth. Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1555):2403-10. PMC: 1691865. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2857. View

2.
Manuck S, McCaffery J . Gene-environment interaction. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 65:41-70. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115100. View

3.
DiPrete T, Jennings J . Social and behavioral skills and the gender gap in early educational achievement. Soc Sci Res. 2012; 41(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.09.001. View

4.
Almond D, Edlund L . Trivers-Willard at birth and one year: evidence from US natality data 1983-2001. Proc Biol Sci. 2007; 274(1624):2491-6. PMC: 2274969. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0524. View

5.
Anderson K . Adverse Childhood Environment: Relationship With Sexual Risk Behaviors and Marital Status in a Large American Sample. Evol Psychol. 2017; 15(2):1474704917710115. PMC: 10481121. DOI: 10.1177/1474704917710115. View