» Articles » PMID: 33517394

Advancing Electronic Health Record Vendor Usability Maturity: Progress and Next Steps

Overview
Date 2021 Jan 31
PMID 33517394
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite basic federal requirements promoting a user-centered design approach to electronic health record (EHR) development and usability testing there have been usability and safety risks with EHR technology. Four EHR vendors were asked to provide written descriptions of their usability practices, and we reviewed these descriptions to identify areas where there has been advancement and areas for improvement. All 4 vendors described user-centered design processes and usability testing methods that demonstrate advancement from previous studies of vendor practices. Importantly, vendors are also beginning to address aspects of EHR implementation that play a critical role in shaping EHR usability. There are important areas for improvement in vendor practices including a greater focus on safety and on measurement and benchmarking. Vendors sharing their current usability practices demonstrates a step toward greater transparency which has typically been lacking.

Citing Articles

A review of human factors and infusion pumps: lessons for procurement.

Herrero L, Cano M, Ratwani R, Sanchez L, Sanchez B, Sancibrian R Front Digit Health. 2025; 7:1425409.

PMID: 39981104 PMC: 11841431. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1425409.


The Impact of Leadership and Management on the Implementation of Electronic Health Record Systems in the Primary Healthcare Centers.

Alzghaibi H, Hutchings H Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(20).

PMID: 39451429 PMC: 11507143. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12202013.


Electronic health record system use and documentation burden of acute and critical care nurse clinicians: a mixed-methods study.

Cho H, Nguyen O, Weaver M, Pruitt J, Marcelle C, Salloum R J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024; 31(11):2540-2549.

PMID: 39259920 PMC: 11491602. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae239.


Design and evaluation of a web-based electronic health record for amblyopia.

Naemi R, Akbarian M, Ebrahimi M, Shahmoradi L, Masoomian B, Rezayi S Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1322821.

PMID: 38638930 PMC: 11025453. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1322821.


Improving the Quality and Utility of Electronic Health Record Data through Ontologies.

Lin A, Arabandi S, Beale T, Duncan W, Hicks A, Hogan W Standards (Basel). 2023; 3(3):316-340.

PMID: 37873508 PMC: 10591519. DOI: 10.3390/standards3030023.


References
1.
Ratwani R, Savage E, Will A, Fong A, Karavite D, Muthu N . Identifying Electronic Health Record Usability And Safety Challenges In Pediatric Settings. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018; 37(11):1752-1759. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0699. View

2.
Gomes K, Ratwani R . Evaluating Improvements and Shortcomings in Clinician Satisfaction With Electronic Health Record Usability. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(12):e1916651. PMC: 6991193. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16651. View

3.
Ratwani R, Fairbanks R, Hettinger A, Benda N . Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 22(6):1179-82. PMC: 11737839. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv050. View

4.
Poon E, Rosenbloom S, Zheng K . Health information technology and clinician burnout: Current understanding, emerging solutions, and future directions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021; 28(5):895-898. PMC: 8068415. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab058. View

5.
Howe J, Adams K, Hettinger A, Ratwani R . Electronic Health Record Usability Issues and Potential Contribution to Patient Harm. JAMA. 2018; 319(12):1276-1278. PMC: 5885839. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.1171. View