» Articles » PMID: 33516188

Pharmacokinetics and Dialytic Clearance of Apixaban During in Vitro Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Overview
Journal BMC Nephrol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2021 Jan 31
PMID 33516188
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To evaluate the transmembrane clearance (CL) of apixaban during modeled in vitro continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), assess protein binding and circuit adsorption, and provide initial dosing recommendations.

Methods: Apixaban was added to the CRRT circuit and serial pre-filter bovine blood samples were collected along with post-filter blood and effluent samples. All experiments were performed in duplicate using continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) and hemodialysis (CVVHD) modes, with varying filter types, flow rates, and point of CVVH replacement fluid dilution. Concentrations of apixaban and urea were quantified via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for apixaban were estimated via noncompartmental analysis. CL was calculated via the estimated area under the curve (AUC) and by the product of the sieving/saturation coefficient (SC/SA) and flow rate. Two and three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) models were built to assess the effects of mode, filter type, flow rate, and point of dilution on CL by each method. Optimal doses were suggested by matching the AUC observed in vitro to the systemic exposure demonstrated in Phase 2/3 studies of apixaban. Linear regression was utilized to provide dosing estimations for flow rates from 0.5-5 L/h.

Results: Mean adsorption to the HF1400 and M150 filters differed significantly at 38 and 13%, respectively, while mean (± standard deviation, SD) percent protein binding was 70.81 ± 0.01%. Effect of CVVH point of dilution did not differ across filter types, although CL was consistently significantly higher during CRRT with the HF1400 filter compared to the M150. The three-way ANOVA demonstrated improved fit when CL values calculated by AUC were used (adjusted R 0.87 vs. 0.52), and therefore, these values were used to generate optimal dosing recommendations. Linear regression revealed significant effects of filter type and flow rate on CL by AUC, suggesting doses of 2.5-7.5 mg twice daily (BID) may be needed for flow rates ranging from 0.5-5 L/h, respectively.

Conclusion: For CRRT flow rates most commonly employed in clinical practice, the standard labeled 5 mg BID dose of apixaban is predicted to achieve target systemic exposure thresholds. The safety and efficacy of these proposed dosing regimens warrants further investigation in clinical studies.

Citing Articles

Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Apixaban in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Haemodialysis.

Konecki C, Lipman M, Mavrakanas T, Djerada Z Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025; 64(2):307-321.

PMID: 39853633 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-025-01476-6.


Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With ESRD and Kidney Transplantation.

Lange N, Muir J, Salerno D Kidney Int Rep. 2025; 10(1):40-53.

PMID: 39810765 PMC: 11725803. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.10.016.


Validation of Cefiderocol Package Insert Dosing Recommendation for Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Prospective Multicenter Pharmacokinetic Study.

Fouad A, Kobic E, Nicolasora N, Thompson Bastin M, Adams P, Shen Y Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024; 11(10):ofae451.

PMID: 39435320 PMC: 11492798. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae451.


Edoxaban pharmacokinetics during in vitro continuous renal replacement therapy.

Wenzler E, Dalton K, Andrews L, Benken S BMC Nephrol. 2024; 25(1):341.

PMID: 39390394 PMC: 11468074. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03777-7.


Anakinra Removal by Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An Ex Vivo Analysis.

Dubinsky S, Watt K, Imburgia C, McKnite A, Hunt J, Rice C Crit Care Explor. 2023; 5(12):e1010.

PMID: 38107537 PMC: 10723863. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001010.


References
1.
Tian Q, Gomersall C, Ip M, Tan P, Joynt G, Choi G . Adsorption of amikacin, a significant mechanism of elimination by hemofiltration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007; 52(3):1009-13. PMC: 2258534. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00858-07. View

2.
Ricci Z, Ronco C, DAmico G, De Felice R, Rossi S, Bolgan I . Practice patterns in the management of acute renal failure in the critically ill patient: an international survey. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005; 21(3):690-6. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfi296. View

3.
Uchino S, Kellum J, Bellomo R, Doig G, Morimatsu H, Morgera S . Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA. 2005; 294(7):813-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.7.813. View

4.
Janssen P, Foudraine N, Burgers D, Neef K, le Noble J . Population Pharmacokinetics of Cefuroxime in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration With Regional Citrate Anticoagulation and a Phosphate-Containing Replacement Fluid. Ther Drug Monit. 2016; 38(6):699-705. DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000330. View

5.
Khanna R, Maynard G, Sadeghi B, Hensley L, Medvedev S, Danielsen B . Incidence of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolic codes in medical patients hospitalized in academic medical centers. J Hosp Med. 2014; 9(4):221-5. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2159. View